Literature DB >> 11781015

Deformation and rupture of the articular surface under dynamic and static compression.

R Flachsmann1, N D Broom, A E Hardy.   

Abstract

Cartilage-on-bone samples were dynamically and statically compressed at various stress levels to determine the deformation and rupture behaviour of the articular surface (AS). Instantaneous deformations were captured photographically by using a transparent indenter in combination with a ultra high speed flash. Principal strains (PS) were evaluated using large deformation theory. The tensile strains induced indirectly in the AS were a function of the rate at which the direct compressive force was applied. At the same compressive stress the tensile strains induced statically were approximately twice those induced dynamically. Rupture of the AS occurred in about 60% of those specimens tested statically at 15 MPa and followed approximately the split-line direction. By contrast, no rupture was observed dynamically even at stresses as high as 28 MPa. In terms of joint function the research demonstrates that the AS is considerably more resistant to rupture under dynamic than under static loading. The biomechanical parameter governing rupture appears to be the level of indirectly induced surface strain rather than the directly applied compressive stress. The very different mechanisms controlling the compressive deformation of articular cartilage (AC) at high vs low rates of loading clearly influence the levels of in-plane strain induced in the AS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11781015     DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00049-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  6 in total

1.  Response of engineered cartilage to mechanical insult depends on construct maturity.

Authors:  A R Tan; E Y Dong; G A Ateshian; C T Hung
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Traversing the intact/fibrillated joint surface: a biomechanical interpretation.

Authors:  Neil D Broom; Thuy Ngo; Evelyn Tham
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  How Does Chondrolabral Damage and Labral Repair Influence the Mechanics of the Hip in the Setting of Cam Morphology? A Finite-Element Modeling Study.

Authors:  Jocelyn N Todd; Travis G Maak; Andrew E Anderson; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Stress-vs-time signals allow the prediction of structurally catastrophic events during fracturing of immature cartilage and predetermine the biomechanical, biochemical, and structural impairment.

Authors:  Bernd Rolauffs; Bodo Kurz; Tino Felka; Miriam Rothdiener; Tatiana Uynuk-Ool; Matthias Aurich; Eliot Frank; Christian Bahrs; Andreas Badke; Ulrich Stöckle; Wilhelm K Aicher; Alan J Grodzinsky
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.867

5.  Apparatus and Method for Rapid Detection of Acoustic Anisotropy in Cartilage.

Authors:  Mostafa Motavalli; Cheyenne Jones; Jim A Berilla; Ming Li; Mark D Schluchter; Joseph M Mansour; Jean F Welter
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 6.  Comparison between in vitro and in vivo cartilage overloading studies based on a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Mieke Nickien; Ashley Heuijerjans; Keita Ito; Corrinus C van Donkelaar
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.494

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.