Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Meiotic alterations in CAG repeat tracts.

Literature DB >> 11779820

Meiotic alterations in CAG repeat tracts.

J K Schweitzer¹, S S Reinke, D M Livingston.

Abstract

We have investigated meiotic changes in CAG repeat tracts embedded in a yeast chromosome. Repeat tracts undergo either conversion events between homologs or expansion and contraction events that appear to be confined to a single chromatid. We did not find evidence for conversion of tract interruptions or excess exchange of flanking markers.

Entities: Species

Mesh：

Year: 2001 PMID： 11779820 PMCID： PMC1461891

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genetics ISSN： 0016-6731 Impact factor: 4.562

15 in total

1. Increased instability of human CTG repeat tracts on yeast artificial chromosomes during gametogenesis.

Authors: H Cohen; D D Sears; D Zenvirth; P Hieter; G Simchen
Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 4.272

2. Expansion and length-dependent fragility of CTG repeats in yeast.

Authors: C H Freudenreich; S M Kantrow; V A Zakian
Journal: Science Date: 1998-02-06 Impact factor: 47.728

3. The impact of lagging strand replication mutations on the stability of CAG repeat tracts in yeast.

Authors: M J Ireland; S S Reinke; D M Livingston
Journal: Genetics Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 4.562

4. Stability of a CTG/CAG trinucleotide repeat in yeast is dependent on its orientation in the genome.

Authors: C H Freudenreich; J B Stavenhagen; V A Zakian
Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 4.272

5. Orientation dependence of trinucleotide CAG repeat instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors: D J Maurer; B L O'Callaghan; D M Livingston
Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 4.272

6. Triplet repeats form secondary structures that escape DNA repair in yeast.

Authors: H Moore; P W Greenwell; C P Liu; N Arnheim; T D Petes
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-02-16 Impact factor: 11.205

7. Evidence for a mechanism predisposing to intergenerational CAG repeat instability in spinocerebellar ataxia type I.

Authors: M Y Chung; L P Ranum; L A Duvick; A Servadio; H Y Zoghbi; H T Orr
Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 38.330

Review 8. Trinucleotide repeats in neurogenetic disorders.

Authors: H L Paulson; K H Fischbeck
Journal: Annu Rev Neurosci Date: 1996 Impact factor: 12.449

9. Orientation-dependent and sequence-specific expansions of CTG/CAG trinucleotide repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors: J J Miret; L Pessoa-Brandão; R S Lahue
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-10-13 Impact factor: 11.205

10. Mapping the polarity of changes that occur in interrupted CAG repeat tracts in yeast.

Authors: D J Maurer; B L O'Callaghan; D M Livingston
Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 4.272

8 in total

1. Genetic instability induced by overexpression of DNA ligase I in budding yeast.

Authors: Jaichandar Subramanian; Sangeetha Vijayakumar; Alan E Tomkinson; Norman Arnheim
Journal: Genetics Date: 2005-06-18 Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2. Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.

Authors: Guy-Franck Richard; Alix Kerrest; Bernard Dujon
Journal: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3. Repeat instability during DNA repair: Insights from model systems.

Authors: Karen Usdin; Nealia C M House; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal: Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 8.250

Review 4. On the wrong DNA track: Molecular mechanisms of repeat-mediated genome instability.

Authors: Alexandra N Khristich; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 5.157

5. Both CAG repeats and inverted DNA repeats stimulate spontaneous unequal sister-chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors: Dilip K Nag; Manisha Suri; Erin K Stenson
Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2004-10-19 Impact factor: 16.971