Literature DB >> 11777014

In search of the neurobiological underpinnings of the differential outcomes effect.

L M Savage1.   

Abstract

Correlating unique rewards with to-be-remembered events (the Differential Outcomes Procedure [DOP]) enhances learning and memory performance in a range of species. Recently, we have demonstrated that the DOP can be used to reduce or eliminate the learning and memory impairments associated with animal models of amnesia and dementia. This powerful phenomenon, the Differential Outcomes Effect (DOE), has led to the question: How does such a simple manipulation exert such dramatic influence on learning and memory performance? A revised two-process account of the DOE states that using the DOP results in the activation of reward expectancies through Pavlovian mechanisms. The use of unique reward expectancies alters the nature of cognitive processing used to solve discrimination tasks. The change in cognitive processing is represented by utilization of a different memory system than that commonly used to acquire and remember information when a Nondifferential Outcomes Procedure (NOP) is used. Using neurochemical manipulations, it has been demonstrated that different, potentially independent, brain systems modulate memory performance when subjects are trained with a NOP versus a DOP. This memory-based DOP/NOP distinction resembles other dissociative memory theories in which two psychological processes are purportedly served by distinct neurobiological mechanisms. In addition, such results have important ramifications for the treatment of memory disorders because they demonstrate that stimulus and behavioral manipulations, like drugs, can influence neurotransmitter functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11777014     DOI: 10.1007/bf02734092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci        ISSN: 1053-881X


  35 in total

1.  Memory enhancement in aged rats: the differential outcomes effect.

Authors:  L M Savage; S R Pitkin; J M Careri
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.038

2.  Relations between source amnesia and frontal lobe functioning in older adults.

Authors:  Fergus I M Craik; Lorna W Morris; Robin G Morris; E Ruth Loewen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1990-03

3.  Cholinergic lesions by 192 IgG-saporin and short-term recognition memory: role of the septohippocampal projection.

Authors:  T Steckler; A B Keith; R G Wiley; A Sahgal
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Neuroanatomy of memory and amnesia: a case for multiple memory systems.

Authors:  L Weiskrantz
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1987

5.  Intraseptal galanin potentiates scopolamine impairment of delayed nonmatching to sample.

Authors:  J K Robinson; J N Crawley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  MK-801 prevents brain lesions and delayed-nonmatching-to-sample deficits produced by pyrithiamine-induced encephalopathy in rats.

Authors:  J K Robinson; R G Mair
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists and working memory performance: comparison with the effects of scopolamine, propranolol, diazepam, and phenylisopropyladenosine.

Authors:  M J Pontecorvo; D B Clissold; M F White; J W Ferkany
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Thiamine deficiency in rats produces cognitive and memory deficits on spatial tasks that correlate with tissue loss in diencephalon, cortex and white matter.

Authors:  P J Langlais; L M Savage
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  On the role of thalamic pathology in diencephalic amnesia.

Authors:  R G Mair
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 4.353

10.  Extracellular glutamate is increased in thalamus during thiamine deficiency-induced lesions and is blocked by MK-801.

Authors:  P J Langlais; S X Zhang
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.372

View more
  16 in total

1.  The differential outcomes procedure can interfere or enhance operant rule learning.

Authors:  Raddy Ramos; Lisa M Savage
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

2.  Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Differential involvement of the basolateral amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens core in the acquisition and use of reward expectancies.

Authors:  Donna R Ramirez; Lisa M Savage
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  The differential outcomes procedure can overcome self-bias in perceptual matching.

Authors:  Luis J Fuentes; Jie Sui; Angeles F Estévez; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

5.  The effects of differential outcomes and different types of consequential stimuli on 7-year-old children's discriminative learning and memory.

Authors:  Lourdes Martínez; Pilar Flores; Carmen González-Salinas; Luis J Fuentes; Angeles F Estévez
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Selective septohippocampal - but not forebrain amygdalar - cholinergic dysfunction in diencephalic amnesia.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Jessica Roland; Anna Klintsova
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Segregated encoding of reward-identity and stimulus-reward associations in human orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Miriam Cornelia Klein-Flügge; Helen Catharine Barron; Kay Henning Brodersen; Raymond J Dolan; Timothy Edward John Behrens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Reward expectation alters learning and memory: the impact of the amygdala on appetitive-driven behaviors.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Raddy L Ramos
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Basolateral amygdala inactivation by muscimol, but not ERK/MAPK inhibition, impairs the use of reward expectancies during working memory.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Andrew D Koch; Donna R Ramirez
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Distinct roles of three frontal cortical areas in reward-guided behavior.

Authors:  M P Noonan; R B Mars; M F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.