Literature DB >> 17907822

Differential involvement of the basolateral amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens core in the acquisition and use of reward expectancies.

Donna R Ramirez1, Lisa M Savage.   

Abstract

In this study, the authors tested the hypothesis that the basolateral amygdala (BLA), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), nucleus accumbens core (NA-core), and the extended hippocampus mediate different aspects of the development-maintenance of unique reward expectancies produced by the differential outcomes procedure (DOP). Rats were trained with either DOP or a nondifferential outcomes procedure (NOP) on a simple discrimination task. Fornix lesions did not affect either version of the task, demonstrating that the extended hippocampal system has no role in stimulus-outcome (S-O) associations. In contrast, in the DOP condition, BLA lesions impaired performance throughout training, OFC lesions impaired choice accuracy only in the later maintenance phase, and NA-core lesions resulted in enhanced learning. These results suggest that BLA and OFC are important for establishment (BLA) and behavioral maintenance (OFC) of S-O associations, whereas the NA-core is not needed and can in fact impede using multiple S-O associations. No impairments were observed in the NOP condition, demonstrating that these structures are not critical to stimulus-response learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17907822      PMCID: PMC2375535          DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.5.896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  38 in total

1.  Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Connections underlying the synthesis of cognition, memory, and emotion in primate prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  H Barbas
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Response-reinforcement learning is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation in the nucleus accumbens core.

Authors:  A E Kelley; S L Smith-Roe; M R Holahan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lesions of orbitofrontal cortex impair rats' differential outcome expectancy learning but not conditioned stimulus-potentiated feeding.

Authors:  Michael A McDannald; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher; Peter C Holland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Lesions of medial prefrontal cortex disrupt the acquisition but not the expression of goal-directed learning.

Authors:  Sean B Ostlund; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Amygdaloid projections to the frontal cortex and the striatum in the rat.

Authors:  H Kita; S T Kitai
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Spatial, movement- and reward-sensitive discharge by medial ventral striatum neurons of rats.

Authors:  A M Lavoie; S J Mizumori
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-02-28       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala encode expected outcomes during learning.

Authors:  G Schoenbaum; A A Chiba; M Gallagher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Associative processes in addiction and reward. The role of amygdala-ventral striatal subsystems.

Authors:  B J Everitt; J A Parkinson; M C Olmstead; M Arroyo; P Robledo; T W Robbins
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 10.  Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Rudolf N Cardinal; John A Parkinson; Jeremy Hall; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  26 in total

1.  Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala lesions result in suboptimal and dissociable reward choices on cue-guided effort in rats.

Authors:  Serena Ostrander; Victor A Cazares; Charissa Kim; Shauna Cheung; Isabel Gonzalez; Alicia Izquierdo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  Does the orbitofrontal cortex signal value?

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Yuji Takahashi; Tzu-Lan Liu; Michael A McDannald
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  Conceptual representations in goal-directed decision making.

Authors:  Nicholas Shea; Kristine Krug; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging.

Authors:  Suzanne N Haber; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Dorsolateral caudate nucleus differentiates cocaine from natural reward-associated contextual cues.

Authors:  Hua-Shan Liu; Svetlana Chefer; Hanbing Lu; Karine Guillem; William Rea; Pradeep Kurup; Yihong Yang; Laura Peoples; Elliot A Stein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Does regular cannabis use affect neuroanatomy? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of structural neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Valentina Lorenzetti; Yann Chye; Pedro Silva; Nadia Solowij; Carl A Roberts
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  The Nucleus Accumbens Core is Necessary to Scale Fear to Degree of Threat.

Authors:  Madelyn H Ray; Alyssa N Russ; Rachel A Walker; Michael A McDannald
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Memory for reward location is enhanced even though acetylcholine efflux within the amygdala is impaired in rats with damage to the diencephalon produced by thiamine deficiency.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Sabrina Guarino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  The differential outcomes procedure can overcome self-bias in perceptual matching.

Authors:  Luis J Fuentes; Jie Sui; Angeles F Estévez; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

10.  The Role of the Rodent Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex in Simple Pavlovian Cue-Outcome Learning Depends on Training Experience.

Authors:  Marios C Panayi; Simon Killcross
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.