Literature DB >> 10573571

Memory enhancement in aged rats: the differential outcomes effect.

L M Savage1, S R Pitkin, J M Careri.   

Abstract

Aged (23 months) and young (3 months) rats were trained on an operant Matching-To-Position (MTP) task that had either (a) specific outcomes (reinforcers) correlated (differential groups), or (b) outcomes uncorrelated (nondifferential groups) for each correct sample-choice sequence. The traditional version of MTP uses a common outcome and is thought to assess spatial working memory. Aged rats are impaired on the traditional version of MTP. However, aged animals trained with the Differential Outcomes Procedure (DOP) did not display the typical age-related decline in spatial working memory. Differences in choice accuracy between old and young rats reached significance only if the subjects were trained with a nondifferential outcomes procedure (NOP)-similar to when a common outcome is used. These data demonstrate that employing behavioral procedures to tap intact cognitive functions is an effective means of enhancing spatial working memory in normal as well as aged subjects. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  12 in total

Review 1.  Conditional choice-unique outcomes establish expectancies that mediate choice behavior.

Authors:  J B Overmier; D Linwick
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep

2.  The differential outcomes procedure can interfere or enhance operant rule learning.

Authors:  Raddy Ramos; Lisa M Savage
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

3.  Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; John T Wixted; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  In search of the neurobiological underpinnings of the differential outcomes effect.

Authors:  L M Savage
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep

Review 6.  Differential outcomes training facilitates memory in people with Korsakoff and Prader-Willi syndromes.

Authors:  A K Hochhalter; B Joseph
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep

7.  Early age-related cognitive impairment in mice lacking cannabinoid CB1 receptors.

Authors:  A Bilkei-Gorzo; I Racz; O Valverde; M Otto; K Michel; M Sastre; M Sarstre; A Zimmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The effects of differential outcomes and different types of consequential stimuli on 7-year-old children's discriminative learning and memory.

Authors:  Lourdes Martínez; Pilar Flores; Carmen González-Salinas; Luis J Fuentes; Angeles F Estévez
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 9.  Reward expectation alters learning and memory: the impact of the amygdala on appetitive-driven behaviors.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Raddy L Ramos
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Basolateral amygdala inactivation by muscimol, but not ERK/MAPK inhibition, impairs the use of reward expectancies during working memory.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Andrew D Koch; Donna R Ramirez
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.