Literature DB >> 11773285

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to provide health-care providers, patients, and the general public with an assessment of currently available data regarding the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: The participants included a non-Federal, non-advocate, 14-member panel representing the fields of oncology, radiology, surgery, pathology, statistics, public health, and health policy as well as patient representatives. In addition, 30 experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology, biostatistics, epidemiology, surgical oncology, and clinical trials presented data to the panel and to a conference audience of 1000. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched with the use of MEDLINE for January 1995 through July 2000, and an extensive bibliography of 2230 references was provided to the panel. Experts prepared abstracts for their conference presentations with relevant citations from the literature. Evidence from randomized clinical trials and evidence from prospective studies were given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed its conclusions based on the evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement, which was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. Thereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. The draft statement was made available on the World Wide Web immediately after its release at the conference and was updated with the panel's final revisions. The statement is available at http://consensus.nih.gov.
CONCLUSIONS: The panel concludes that decisions regarding adjuvant hormonal therapy should be based on the presence of hormone receptor protein in tumor tissues. Adjuvant hormonal therapy should be offered only to women whose tumors express hormone receptor protein. Because adjuvant polychemotherapy improves survival, it should be recommended to the majority of women with localized breast cancer regardless of lymph node, menopausal, or hormone receptor status. The inclusion of anthracyclines in adjuvant chemotherapy regimens produces a small but statistically significant improvement in survival over non-anthracycline-containing regimens. Available data are currently inconclusive regarding the use of taxanes in adjuvant treatment of lymph node-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens in high-risk breast cancer and of taxanes in lymph node-negative breast cancer should be restricted to randomized trials. Ongoing studies evaluating these treatment strategies should be supported to determine if such strategies have a role in adjuvant treatment. Studies to date have included few patients older than 70 years. There is a critical need for trials to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in these women. There is evidence that women with a high risk of locoregional tumor recurrence after mastectomy benefit from postoperative radiotherapy. This high-risk group includes women with four or more positive lymph nodes or an advanced primary cancer. Currently, the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients with one to three positive lymph nodes remains uncertain and should be tested in a randomized controlled trial. Individual patients differ in the importance they place on the risks and benefits of adjuvant treatments. Quality of life needs to be evaluated in selected randomized clinical trials to examine the impact of the major acute and long-term side effects of adjuvant treatments, particularly premature menopause, weight gain, mild memory loss, and fatigue. Methods to support shared decision-making between patients and their physicians have been successful in trials; they need to be tailored for diverse populations and should be tested for broader dissemination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11773285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  32 in total

1.  A web-based system for individualised survival estimation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Johan Lundin; Mikael Lundin; Jorma Isola; Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

Review 2.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy in intermediate-risk patients: the gray zone.

Authors:  Carolyn I Sartor
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Differences in Colorectal and Breast Cancer Treatment Quality: The Role of Physician-level Variations in Care.

Authors:  Ioana Popescu; Deborah Schrag; Alfonso Ang; Mitchell Wong
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Assessing the impact of a cooperative group trial on breast cancer care in the medicare population.

Authors:  Pamela R Soulos; James B Yu; Kenneth B Roberts; Ann C Raldow; Jeph Herrin; Jessica B Long; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Chemotherapy use for hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Melissa E Hughes; Joyce C Niland; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Yu-Ning Wong; John Wilson; W Bradford Carter; Douglas W Blayney; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Derivation of molecular signatures for breast cancer recurrence prediction using a two-way validation approach.

Authors:  Yijun Sun; Virginia Urquidi; Steve Goodison
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  The prognostic importance of cathepsin D and E-cadherin in early breast cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Galia Jacobson-Raber; Irena Lazarev; Victor Novack; Willmosh Mermershtein; Yael Baumfeld; David B Geffen; Netta Sion-Vardy; Samuel Ariad
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Impact of a scientific presentation on community treatment patterns for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Sharon H Giordano; Zhigang Duan; Yong-Fang Kuo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Jean Freeman; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Patterns of treatment for early stage breast cancers at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1997 to 2004.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Wenli Dong; Barry W Feig; Peter Ravdin; Richard L Theriault; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Reassessing the role of axillary lymph-node dissection in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeff Marschall; Patrik Nechala; Patrick Colquhoun; Rajni Chibbar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.