Literature DB >> 11772766

Incomplete birth certificates: a risk marker for infant mortality.

Jeffrey B Gould1, Gilberto Chavez, Amy R Marks, Hao Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the relationship between incomplete birth certificates and infant mortality.
METHODS: Birth certificates from California (n = 538 945) were assessed in regard to underreporting of 13 predictors of perinatal outcomes and mortality.
RESULTS: Of the birth certificates studied, 7.25% were incomplete. Underreporting was most common in the case of women at high risk for poor perinatal outcomes and infants dying within the first day. Increasing numbers of unreported items were shown to be associated with corresponding increases in neonatal and postneonatal mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete birth certificates provide an important marker for identifying high-risk women and vulnerable infants. Because data "cleaning" will result in the removal of mothers and infants at highest risk, birth certificate analyses should include incomplete records.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11772766      PMCID: PMC1447393          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.1.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  14 in total

1.  Are we underestimating rates of vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth? The validity of delivery methods from birth certificates.

Authors:  D C Green; J M Moore; M M Adams; C J Berg; L S Wilcox; B J McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The 1989 revisions of the US Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the US Standard Report of Fetal Death.

Authors:  M A Freedman; G A Gay; J E Brockert; P W Potrzebowski; C J Rothwell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The surveillance of birth defects: the usefulness of the revised US standard birth certificate.

Authors:  M L Watkins; L Edmonds; A McClearn; L Mullins; J Mulinare; M Khoury
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Variations in the accuracy of obstetric procedures and diagnoses on birth records in Washington State, 1989.

Authors:  K M Parrish; V L Holt; F A Connell; B Williams; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.

Authors:  P A Buescher; K P Taylor; M H Davis; J M Bowling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The quality and completeness of birthweight and gestational age data in computerized birth files.

Authors:  R J David
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The underregistration of neonatal deaths: Georgia 1974--77.

Authors:  B J McCarthy; J Terry; R W Rochat; S Quave; C W Tyler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Assessment of gestational age using birth certificate data compared with medical record data.

Authors:  E S Emery; A Eaton; J K Grether; K B Nelson
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Infant mortality statistics from the 1997 period linked birth/infant death data set.

Authors:  M F MacDorman; J O Atkinson
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  1999-07-30

10.  Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records.

Authors:  J M Piper; E F Mitchel; M Snowden; C Hall; M Adams; P Taylor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  12 in total

1.  Academic achievement varies with gestational age among children born at term.

Authors:  Kimberly G Noble; William P Fifer; Virginia A Rauh; Yoko Nomura; Howard F Andrews
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Modeling the pediatric paradox: birth weight by gestational age.

Authors:  Timothy B Gage; Fu Fang; Howard Stratton
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2008

3.  Evaluation of gestational age estimate method on the calculation of preterm birth rates.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Alonzo T Folger; Elizabeth A Kelly; Beena Devi Kamath-Rayne
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

4.  Perinatal Disparities Between American Indians and Alaska Natives and Other US Populations: Comparative Changes in Fetal and First Day Mortality, 1995-2008.

Authors:  Martha S Wingate; Wanda D Barfield; Ruben A Smith; Joann Petrini
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-08

5.  A Longitudinal Study of Changes in Prenatal Care Utilization Between First and Second Births and Low Birth Weight.

Authors:  Christine T Loftus; Orion T Stewart; Mark D Hensley; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Stephen E Hawes
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

6.  Birth Settings and the Validation of Neonatal Seizures Recorded in Birth Certificates Compared to Medicaid Claims and Hospital Discharge Abstracts Among Live Births in South Carolina, 1996-2013.

Authors:  Qing Li; Dorothea D Jenkins; Stephen L Kinsman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-05

7.  Effects of social and psychosocial factors on risk of preterm birth in black women.

Authors:  Dawn Misra; Donna Strobino; Britton Trabert
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Paternal race/ethnicity and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Sai Ma
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Excess Hispanic fetal-infant mortality in a midwestern community.

Authors:  Gerald L Hoff; Jinwen Cai; Felix A Okah; Paul C Dew
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  The importance of geographic data aggregation in assessing disparities in American Indian prenatal care.

Authors:  Pamela Jo Johnson; Kathleen Thiede Call; Lynn A Blewett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.