Literature DB >> 8629729

The surveillance of birth defects: the usefulness of the revised US standard birth certificate.

M L Watkins1, L Edmonds, A McClearn, L Mullins, J Mulinare, M Khoury.   

Abstract

To assess the sensitivity and positive predictive value of birth defects reported on the 1989 revision of the US Standard Birth Certificate, a population of 76,862 Atlanta-area births during 1989 and 1990 was used as the basis for comparing 771 birth certificates that reported birth defects with 2428 live-born infant records in a birth defects registry that uses multiple sources of case ascertainment. Only 14% of birth defects in the registry records were reported on birth certificates. After the analysis was restricted to defects recognizable at birth, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the birth certificates were 28% and 77%, respectively. Birth certificates underestimate birth defect rates and should be used cautiously for birth defect surveillance and epidemiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8629729      PMCID: PMC1380486          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  15 in total

1.  The 1989 revisions of the US Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the US Standard Report of Fetal Death.

Authors:  M A Freedman; G A Gay; J E Brockert; P W Potrzebowski; C J Rothwell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  False-positive reporting of Down syndrome on Ohio and New York birth certificates.

Authors:  K M Johnson; C A Huether; E B Hook; C A Crowe; B A Reeder; A Sommer; M M McCorquodale; P K Cross
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  An improved system for reporting congenital malformations.

Authors:  S D Minton; R E Seegmiller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Completeness and accuracy of reporting of malformations on birth certificates.

Authors:  M Mackeprang; S Hay; A S Lunde
Journal:  HSMHA Health Rep       Date:  1972-01

5.  The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.

Authors:  P A Buescher; K P Taylor; M H Davis; J M Bowling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Birth complication reporting: the effect of birth certificate design.

Authors:  F Frost; P Starzyk; S George; J F McLaughlin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Under-reporting of birth defects in Hawaii: a pilot study.

Authors:  S J Bintliff; D B Hernandez
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  1978-06

8.  Birth certificate data: how reliable?

Authors:  J B Gregg; W F Stanage; W Johnson
Journal:  S D J Med       Date:  1984-11

9.  Revised U.S. certificate of birth--new opportunities for research on birth outcome.

Authors:  S M Taffel; S J Ventura; G A Gay
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.689

10.  Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records.

Authors:  J M Piper; E F Mitchel; M Snowden; C Hall; M Adams; P Taylor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  30 in total

1.  Birth defects surveillance: assessing the "gold standard".

Authors:  M A Honein; L J Paulozzi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Public health 101 for informaticians.

Authors:  D Koo; P O'Carroll; M LaVenture
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison.

Authors:  Heather M Bradford; Vicky Cárdenas; Katherine Camacho-Carr; Mona T Lydon-Rochelle
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-02-06

4.  Clustering of U.S. women receiving no prenatal care: differences in pregnancy outcomes and implications for targeting interventions.

Authors:  Cathy R Taylor; Greg R Alexander; Joseph T Hepworth
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

5.  Fetal death certificates as a source of surveillance data for stillbirths with birth defects.

Authors:  C Wes Duke; C J Alverson; Anolfo Correa
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Maternal Chlamydia Infection During Pregnancy and Risk of Cyanotic Congenital Heart Defects in the Offspring.

Authors:  Diane Y Dong; José N Binongo; Vijaya Kancherla
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-01

7.  Validity of insurance information on California birth certificates.

Authors:  P Braveman; M Pearl; S Egerter; K Marchi; R Williams
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The quality of data reported on birth certificates.

Authors:  R S Kirby
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information.

Authors:  David L DiGiuseppe; David C Aron; Lorin Ranbom; Dwain L Harper; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-09

10.  Maternal residential exposure to agricultural pesticides and birth defects in a 2003 to 2005 North Carolina birth cohort.

Authors:  Kristen M Rappazzo; Joshua L Warren; Robert E Meyer; Amy H Herring; Alison P Sanders; Naomi C Brownstein; Thomas J Luben
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2016-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.