Literature DB >> 19350763

Modeling the pediatric paradox: birth weight by gestational age.

Timothy B Gage1, Fu Fang, Howard Stratton.   

Abstract

The "pediatric paradox" of African versus European American infant mortality is often observed with respect to birth weight, but rarely to gestational age, even though the two measures are biologically related. This paper models the pediatric paradox by birth weight and gestational age simultaneously, using Covariate Density Defined mixture of logistic regressions (CDDmlr) fitted to 1985-1988 New York State births. The model controls for unobserved heterogeneity and isolates the pediatric paradox in the "compromised" subpopulation. The paradox is not limited to low birth weights and/or short gestational ages, but surrounds the normal birth range. Nevertheless, the pediatric paradox is only observed in the marginal distribution of birth weight and not the marginal distribution of gestational age. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that higher fetal losses in the "compromised" subpopulation may be responsible for the pediatric paradox and that African versus European American infant mortality differentials are underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19350763      PMCID: PMC2676891          DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2008.9989134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol        ISSN: 1948-5565


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination.

Authors:  David A Savitz; James W Terry; Nancy Dole; John M Thorp; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Amy H Herring
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Invited commentary: analysis of gestational-age-specific mortality--on what biologic foundations?

Authors:  Allen J Wilcox; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Invited commentary: what's so bad about curves crossing anyway?

Authors:  Mark A Klebanoff; Kenneth C Schoendorf
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Birth-weight-specific infant and neonatal mortality: effects of heterogeneity in the birth cohort.

Authors:  Timothy B Gage
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 0.553

5.  Why do small twins have a lower mortality rate than small singletons?

Authors:  P Buekens; A Wilcox
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Variability of gestational age distributions by sex and ethnicity: An analysis using mixture models.

Authors:  Timothy B. Gage
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.937

7.  Race and birth weight: the Chinese example.

Authors:  R Yip; Z Li; W H Chong
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Birth weight-specific infant mortality, United States, 1960 and 1980.

Authors:  J W Buehler; J C Kleinman; C J Hogue; L T Strauss; J C Smith
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Differences in neonatal and postneonatal mortality by race, birth weight, and gestational age.

Authors:  W M Sappenfield; J W Buehler; N J Binkin; C J Hogue; L T Strauss; J C Smith
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Analysis of neonatal mortality:is standardizing for relative birth weight biased?

Authors:  Robert W Platt; Cande V Ananth; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  3 in total

1.  Joint Bayesian analysis of birthweight and censored gestational age using finite mixture models.

Authors:  Scott L Schwartz; Alan E Gelfand; Marie L Miranda
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Adverse subpopulation regression for multivariate outcomes with high-dimensional predictors.

Authors:  Bin Zhu; David B Dunson; Allison E Ashley-Koch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Obesity paradox in heart failure: statistical artifact, or impetus to rethink clinical practice?

Authors:  Richard Charnigo; Maya Guglin
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.214

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.