Literature DB >> 11767800

A survey of genetic counselors' use of informed consent documents for prenatal genetic counseling sessions.

G M Jacobson1, P M Veach, B S LeRoy.   

Abstract

Thirty six members of the Prenatal Diagnosis Special Interest Group of the National Society of Genetic Counselors were interviewed about their use of informed consent documents for the genetic counseling component of their prenatal genetic counseling sessions and their perceptions of the utility and feasibility of such documents. Major findings include (1) None of the genetic counselors currently used a consent document describing the genetic counseling component of the session itself; (2) Only three participants stated that they had ever used an informed consent document for this component of the session; (3) They disagreed about the importance and usefulness of such a document; (4) There was variability in their reported likelihood of using a document if one were available; (5) There was a fair amount of agreement about the types of information to include on an informed consent document for genetic counseling; over half of the sample endorsed 8 of 10 topics; and (6) Participants identified 10 obstacles to using such a document. Recommendations for genetic counseling practice, policy, and research are given.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11767800     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009499128965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  18 in total

1.  Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Sarah E Truesdell; Bonnie S LeRoy; Dianne M Bartels
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement.

Authors:  S Shiloh; O Avdor; R M Goodman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1990-12

3.  Variation in content in prenatal genetic counseling interviews.

Authors:  B M Burke; A Kolker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Practice variability in prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  E T Matloff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Informed consent: recall by patients tested postoperatively.

Authors:  G Robinson; A Merav
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Testing for inherited susceptibility to breast cancer: a survey of informed consent forms for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing.

Authors:  S J Durfy; T E Buchanan; W Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1998-01-06

Review 7.  Legal issues in perinatal care.

Authors:  A Rhodes
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1987

8.  Reproductive pasts, reproductive futures. Genetic counseling and its effectiveness.

Authors:  J R Sorenson; J P Swazey; N A Scotch; C M Kavanagh; D B Matthews
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1981

9.  Ethical and professional challenges posed by patients with genetic concerns: a report of focus group discussions with genetic counselors, physicians, and nurses.

Authors:  P M Veach; D M Bartels; B S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Informed consent: using a structured interview changes patients' attitudes towards informed consent.

Authors:  P J Dawes; L O'Keefe; S Adcock
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.469

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Qualitative Investigation of Somali Immigrant Perceptions of Disability: Implications for Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  C J Greeson; P M Veach; B S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  'Nobody tosses a dwarf!' The relation between the empirical and the normative reexamined.

Authors:  Carlo Leget; Pascal Borry; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Are good intentions good enough? Informed consent without trained interpreters.

Authors:  Linda M Hunt; Katherine B de Voogd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 5.128

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.