Literature DB >> 8228589

Informed consent: using a structured interview changes patients' attitudes towards informed consent.

P J Dawes1, L O'Keefe, S Adcock.   

Abstract

Patients want to know more about their condition and its proposed treatment. Gaining patients' confidence before treatment reduces the changes of their seeking legal redress for an unexpected outcome. As part of a prospective study of informed consent for surgery we have assessed the attitudes of patients towards informed consent when different types of consent interview are used. We found that most patients are happy to do as their doctor advises but think the informal consent interview is important because it gives them information; they also want to know about most, but not all, complications of the procedure. One quarter worried about the anaesthetic, about one eighth worried about 'not waking up' and similar proportions worried about complications and other things such as pain and nausea. Most patients think that the consent form is a legal document. In addition patients who had an informal interview felt obliged to sign the consent form and thought it had medicolegal implications. In contrast those who had a structured interview felt less obliged to sign the consent form and more involved in the decision to operate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8228589     DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100124417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  10 in total

Review 1.  Informed consent for clinical treatment.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Allan V Prochazka; Aaron S Fink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Risks and medico-legal aspects of endoscopic sinus surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Re; G Magliulo; R Romeo; F M Gioacchini; E Pasquini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Ethical and Legal Issues in Biobanking for Genomic Research in Nigeria.

Authors:  Simisola O Akintola
Journal:  BEOnline       Date:  2012

4.  Surgeons' opinions and practice of informed consent in Nigeria.

Authors:  Temidayo O Ogundiran; Clement A Adebamowo
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  A survey of genetic counselors' use of informed consent documents for prenatal genetic counseling sessions.

Authors:  G M Jacobson; P M Veach; B S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The influence of written information during the consenting process on patients' recall of operative risks. A prospective randomised study.

Authors:  C Mauffrey; E M Prempeh; J John; G Vasario
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Informed consent for inguinal herniorrhaphy and cholecystectomy: describing how patients make decisions to have surgery.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Penelope Morrison; Cara Nikolajski; Michael Fine; Robert Arnold; Susan L Zickmund
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  A Prospective Randomized Control Study on Patient's Recall of Consent after Hand Surgery: How Much They Want to Know?

Authors:  Zeeshan Khan; Adele E Sayers; Mohammad U Khattak; Nicholas C Eastley; Syed O Shafqat
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-11-06

10.  Psychiatric morbidity, pain perception, and functional status of chronic pain patients in palliative care.

Authors:  V Rajmohan; Suresh K Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2013-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.