Literature DB >> 11764076

Safely reducing manual urine microscopy analyses by combining urine flow cytometer and strip results.

S Roggeman1, Z Zaman.   

Abstract

We aimed to reduce the number of manual urine microscopy examinations safely by cross-interpretation of the Sysmex UF-100 (TOA Medical Electronics, Kobe, Japan) and urine strip results such that microscopy would be performed if there was discordance between the UF-100 and urine strip results. We also evaluated the usefulness of the optional UF-100 expert software. We performed 2 studies: study 1 to establish review rules for eventual microscopic examination; study 2, a validation study. Our review rates were 40% and 48% and those of UF-100 software were 16% and 32% for the 2 studies. Our false-positive and false-negative results, among the samples not flagged for microscopic review, were acceptably low. We did not find a good correlation between the microscopic classification of RBC morphologic features and the classification given by the UF-100. Since incorporation of the automated urine strip reader and the UF-100 in routine use, our manual microscopy has been reduced to less than 40%.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11764076     DOI: 10.1309/GRT7-Q6WP-VGWE-0YUM

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  5 in total

1.  Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.

Authors:  S Mayo; D Acevedo; C Quiñones-Torrelo; I Canós; M Sancho
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Screening of urine samples by flow cytometry reduces the need for culture.

Authors:  Santra Jolkkonen; Eeva-Liisa Paattiniemi; Pauliina Kärpänoja; Hannu Sarkkinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy.

Authors:  Hatice Yüksel; Elif Kiliç; Aysun Ekinci; Osman Evliyaoğlu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Comparison of Cobas 6500 and Iris IQ200 fully-automated urine analyzers to manual urine microscopy.

Authors:  Ebubekir Bakan; Nurinnisa Ozturk; Nurcan Kilic Baygutalp; Elif Polat; Kadriye Akpinar; Emrullah Dorman; Harun Polat; Nuri Bakan
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

5.  Comparison of the performance of the IDEXX SediVue Dx® with manual microscopy for the detection of cells and 2 crystal types in canine and feline urine.

Authors:  Annalisa M Hernandez; Graham E A Bilbrough; Dennis B DeNicola; Celine Myrick; Suzanne Edwards; Jeremy M Hammond; Alex N Myers; Johanna C Heseltine; Karen Russell; Marco Giraldi; Mary B Nabity
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.333

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.