Literature DB >> 11764030

Electron dosimetry based on the absorbed dose to water concept: a comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and DIN 6800-2 protocols.

O S Dohm1, G Christ, F Nüsslin, E Schüle, G Bruggmoser.   

Abstract

The dosimetry protocols DIN 6800-2 and AAPM TG-51, both based on the absorbed dose to water concept, are compared in their theoretical background and in their application to electron dosimetry. The agreement and disagreement in correction factors and energy parameters used in both protocols will be shown and discussed. Measurements with three different types of ionization chambers were performed and evaluated according to both protocols. As a result the perturbation correction factor P(60Co)wall for the Roos chamber was determined to 1.024 +/- 0.5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11764030     DOI: 10.1118/1.1414008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  2 in total

1.  Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams.

Authors:  Malcolm McEwen; Larry DeWerd; Geoffrey Ibbott; David Followill; David W O Rogers; Stephen Seltzer; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Absolute dose determination in high-energy electron beams: Comparison of IAEA dosimetry protocols.

Authors:  S Sathiyan; M Ravikumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.