Literature DB >> 11761053

Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities.

M R Servedio1.   

Abstract

The evolution of premating isolation after secondary contact is primarily considered in the guise of reinforcement, which relies on low hybrid fitness as the driving force for mating preference divergence. Here I consider two additional forces that may play a substantial role in the adaptive evolution of premating isolation, direct selection on preferences and indirect selection against postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. First, I argue that a combination of ecological character displacement and sensory bias can cause direct selection on preferences that results in the pattern of reproductive character displacement. Both analytical and numerical methods are then used to demonstrate that, as expected from work in single populations, such direct selection will easily overwhelm indirect selection due to low hybrid fitness as the primary determinant of preference evolution. Second, postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities are presented as a driving force in the evolution of premating isolation. Two classes of these mechanisms, those increasing female mortality after mating but before producing offspring and those reducing female fertility, are shown to be identical in their effects on preference divergence. Analytical and numerical techniques are then used to demonstrate that postmating, prezygotic factors may place strong selection on preference divergence. These selective forces are shown to be comparable if not greater than those produced by the low fitness of hybrids.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11761053     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01309.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  23 in total

1.  Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement.

Authors:  P Nosil; B J Crespi; C P Sandoval
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Disruptive sexual selection on male nuptial coloration in an experimental hybrid population of cichlid fish.

Authors:  Rike B Stelkens; Michele E R Pierotti; Domino A Joyce; Alan M Smith; Inke van der Sluijs; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Behavioural reproductive isolation and speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Punita Nanda; Bashisth Narayan Singh
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Female mating preference functions predict sexual selection against hybrids between sibling species of cichlid fish.

Authors:  Inke van der Sluijs; Tom J M Van Dooren; Kees D Hofker; Jacques J M van Alphen; Rike B Stelkens; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Mitonuclear Ecology.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Theory Meets Empiry: A Citation Network Analysis.

Authors:  Courtney L Fitzpatrick; Elizabeth A Hobson; Tamra C Mendelson; Rafael L Rodríguez; Rebecca J Safran; Elizabeth S C Scordato; Maria R Servedio; Caitlin A Stern; Laurel B Symes; Michael Kopp
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 8.589

7.  Origin of sexual isolation in Drosophila ananassae due to founder effects.

Authors:  Punita Nanda; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The complex genetic architecture of male mate choice evolution between Drosophila species.

Authors:  Michael P Shahandeh; Thomas L Turner
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.