Literature DB >> 32203250

The complex genetic architecture of male mate choice evolution between Drosophila species.

Michael P Shahandeh1, Thomas L Turner2.   

Abstract

Mate choice behaviors are among the most important reproductive isolating barriers in many animals. Little is known about the genetic basis of reproductively isolating behaviors, but examples to date provide evidence that they can have a simple genetic basis. However, it is unclear if these results indicate that individual genes with large effects are common, or are instead due to ascertainment biases. Here, we present the results of a QTL mapping study for the most important behavioral isolating barrier between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia: male mate choice. Our QTL results initially suggested that differences in male mate choice may be due to a couple loci with large effects. However, as we divided the largest-effect QTL using stable introgression strains, we found evidence of multiple interacting loci. We further find that separate regions of the genome control different aspects of male choice. Taken together, our results suggest that the genetic architecture of mate choice behavior, in this case, is more complex than QTL mapping suggested, highlighting potential challenges to future mapping studies. We discuss the implications of these results as they relate to signal-receiver coevolution, mate choice, and reproductive isolation.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32203250      PMCID: PMC7239879          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-020-0309-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  68 in total

1.  R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses.

Authors:  Karl W Broman; Hao Wu; Saunak Sen; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  The genetic architecture of insect courtship behavior and premating isolation.

Authors:  D Arbuthnott
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  The evolution of strong reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Nicholas H Barton; Maria Angeles Rodriguez de Cara
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Mutations in DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and spinal circuit function in mice.

Authors:  Lisa S Andersson; Martin Larhammar; Fatima Memic; Hanna Wootz; Doreen Schwochow; Carl-Johan Rubin; Kalicharan Patra; Thorvaldur Arnason; Lisbeth Wellbring; Göran Hjälm; Freyja Imsland; Jessica L Petersen; Molly E McCue; James R Mickelson; Gus Cothran; Nadav Ahituv; Lars Roepstorff; Sofia Mikko; Anna Vallstedt; Gabriella Lindgren; Leif Andersson; Klas Kullander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Smells like evolution: the role of chemoreceptor evolution in behavioral change.

Authors:  Jessica Cande; Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Specialized cells tag sexual and species identity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Billeter; Jade Atallah; Joshua J Krupp; Jocelyn G Millar; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A female-biased expressed elongase involved in long-chain hydrocarbon biosynthesis and courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Chertemps; Line Duportets; Carole Labeur; Ryu Ueda; Kuniaki Takahashi; Kaoru Saigo; Claude Wicker-Thomas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Inexpensive multiplexed library preparation for megabase-sized genomes.

Authors:  Michael Baym; Sergey Kryazhimskiy; Tami D Lieberman; Hattie Chung; Michael M Desai; Roy Kishony
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Olfactory receptor and circuit evolution promote host specialization.

Authors:  Thomas O Auer; Mohammed A Khallaf; Ana F Silbering; Giovanna Zappia; Kaitlyn Ellis; Raquel Álvarez-Ocaña; J Roman Arguello; Bill S Hansson; Gregory S X E Jefferis; Sophie J C Caron; Markus Knaden; Richard Benton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Mate choice in fruit flies is rational and adaptive.

Authors:  Devin Arbuthnott; Tatyana Y Fedina; Scott D Pletcher; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 17.694

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evolution of assortative mating following selective introgression of pigmentation genes between two Drosophila species.

Authors:  Jean R David; Erina A Ferreira; Laure Jabaud; David Ogereau; Héloïse Bastide; Amir Yassin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  The genetic architecture of temperature adaptation is shaped by population ancestry and not by selection regime.

Authors:  Kathrin A Otte; Viola Nolte; François Mallard; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 13.583

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.