Literature DB >> 11757569

A comparative analysis of the center of gravity and center of pressure trajectory path lengths in standing posture: an estimation of active stiffness.

O Caron1, T Gelat, P Rougier, J P Blanchi.   

Abstract

The center of foot pressure (CP) motions, representing the net neuromuscular control, was compared to the center of gravity (CG) motions, representing the net performance. The comparison focused on the trajectory path length parameter along the medio-lateral and antero-posterior axes because these two variables depend on amplitude versus frequency relationship. This relationship was used to evaluate the CG motions based on the CP motions. Seven subjects stood still on a force plate with eyes open and eyes closed. The results showed that the ratio of (CP-CG)/CP trajectory path length was personal for each subject. These results suggest different levels of passive (ligaments, elastic properties) and active (reflex activity) stiffness. For some subjects, this ratio was significantly lower for the eyes open condition than for the eyes closed condition, indicating a decrease of the active stiffness for the eyes open condition. Therefore, a CG-CP comparative analysis appeared helpful in understanding the control of balance and necessary to quantify the subjects' net performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11757569     DOI: 10.1123/jab.16.3.234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  23 in total

1.  The influences of time-of-day and sleep deprivation on postural control.

Authors:  Clement Bougard; Marie-Charlotte Lepelley; Damien Davenne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Is postural control affected by expertise in alpine skiing?

Authors:  F Noé; T Paillard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  How attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Gilel Nafati
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-08

4.  Compatibility of postural behavior induced by two aspects of visual feedback: time delay and scale display.

Authors:  P Rougier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Do sensorial manipulations affect subjects differently depending on their postural abilities?

Authors:  Thierry Paillard; Riadh Bizid; Philippe Dupui
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Postural performance and strategy in the unipedal stance of soccer players at different levels of competition.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard; Frédéric Noé; Terence Rivière; Vincent Marion; Richard Montoya; Philippe Dupui
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  How a plantar pressure-based, tongue-placed tactile biofeedback modifies postural control mechanisms during quiet standing.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Nicolas Pinsault; Olivier Chenu; Matthieu Boisgontier; Jacques Demongeot; Yohan Payan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The effects of fall-risk-increasing drugs on postural control: a literature review.

Authors:  Maartje H de Groot; Jos P C M van Campen; Marije A Moek; Linda R Tulner; Jos H Beijnen; Claudine J C Lamoth
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  The difficulty of postural tasks amplifies the effects of fatigue on postural stability.

Authors:  Jose Luis Bermejo; Xavier García-Massó; Manuel Gomis; Frederic Noé; Florentino Huertas; Carlos Pablos; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Discrepancy in the involution of the different neural loops with age.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Yannick Gasnier; Noëlle Bru; Jean-Louis Jully; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.