Literature DB >> 15875170

Compatibility of postural behavior induced by two aspects of visual feedback: time delay and scale display.

P Rougier1.   

Abstract

Fourteen healthy adults were tested to assess the potential influence on stance maintenance of two parts of the visual feedback technique (display scale and time delay). The task consisted in their keeping a spot on the screen representing their center of pressure, CoP (i.e. successive points of application of the ground reaction forces detected by the force platform on which they were standing) to a minimum size. The analysis focused on elementary motions computed from the complex CoP trajectories, that is the horizontal motion of the center of gravity (CoG(h)) and the difference between the CoP and the vertical projection of the center of gravity (CoP-CoG(v)). The former is recognized as the main variable in postural control, and several interesting features can be extracted from the latter. The results indicate that setting a delay and increasing the display scale induce substantial reductions in CoP-CoG(v) and CoG(h) displacements, respectively. Interestingly, when the two effects are combined, these single effects cohabit quite happily. Fractional Brownian motion modeling of these trajectories revealed clearly that, in each case, these effects originate principally from poor or improved control, respectively. This feature confirms that these elementary motions are involved differently in the postural system and that study of the complex CoP might not be of great interest. By generating opposing but complementary trends, the visual feedback technique should thus be perceived as a promising tool for inducing particular postural behavior in healthy and disabled individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15875170     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2288-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Influence of visual feedback on successive control mechanisms in upright quiet stance in humans assessed by fractional Brownian motion modelling.

Authors:  P Rougier
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Automatic determination of the transition between successive control mechanisms in upright stance assessed by modelling of the centre of pressure.

Authors:  P Rougier
Journal:  Arch Physiol Biochem       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Backward and forward leaning postures modelled by an fBm framework.

Authors:  P Rougier; C Burdet; I Farenc; L Berger
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.304

4.  Visual feedback induces opposite effects on elementary centre of gravity and centre of pressure minus centre of gravity motions in undisturbed upright stance.

Authors:  Patrice Rougier
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Why we walk the way we do.

Authors:  Y Brenière
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS.

Authors:  E HENNEMAN; G SOMJEN; D O CARPENTER
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A basic posture control mechanism: the stabilization of the centre of gravity.

Authors:  G A Horstmann; V Dietz
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-08

8.  Are dynamic phenomena prior to stepping essential to walking?

Authors:  Y Brenière; M Cuong Do; S Bouisset
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories.

Authors:  J J Collins; C J De Luca
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The influence of having the eyelids open or closed on undisturbed postural control.

Authors:  P Rougier
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  4 in total

1.  Relation between postural control assessment with eyes open and centre of pressure visual feedback effects in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Samir Boudrahem; Patrice R Rougier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Relative efficacy of various strategies for visual feedback in standing balance activities.

Authors:  Michael W Kennedy; Charles R Crowell; Aaron D Striegel; Michael Villano; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Voluntarily controlled but not merely observed visual feedback affects postural sway.

Authors:  Shu Imaizumi; Tomohisa Asai; Kentaro Hiromitsu; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.

Authors:  Michael W Kennedy; Charles R Crowell; Michael Villano; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.