Literature DB >> 23423303

Discrepancy in the involution of the different neural loops with age.

Julien Maitre1, Yannick Gasnier, Noëlle Bru, Jean-Louis Jully, Thierry Paillard.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of sensory manipulations on postural control for subjects of different ages. A young group of subjects (n = 17; 20.0 ± 1.3 years) and an old group of subjects (n = 17; 74.7 ± 6.3 years) were compared in 14 postural conditions [2 reference conditions and 12 sensory manipulation conditions: eyes closed, cervical collar, tendon vibration, electromyostimulation, galvanic vestibular stimulation (2 designs), foam surface] on a force platform. Spatio-temporal parameters of the center of foot pressure displacement were analyzed. When vestibular or proprioceptive afferences were manipulated, the old group was more disturbed than the young group. In addition, when myo-articular proprioceptive afferences were the only non-manipulated information source, the old group was also more disturbed than the young group. Hence, the inability to correctly interpret proprioceptive information and/or the impairment of myo-articular information would appear to be the major factor causing postural control deterioration. Moreover, concerning the vestibular system, it may be that aging alters the central integration of vestibular afferences. These results suggest that aging differently affects the functional ability of the different neural loops in postural control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23423303     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-013-2608-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  68 in total

1.  Effects of cervical collars on standing balance.

Authors:  M M Burl; J G Williams; U S Nayak
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; James P Coxon; Nicole Wenderoth; Annouchka Van Impe; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults.

Authors:  T E Prieto; J B Myklebust; R G Hoffmann; E G Lovett; B M Myklebust
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 4.  Contribution of muscle weakness to postural instability in the elderly. A systematic review.

Authors:  R Orr
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.874

5.  [Spinal effects of electric vestibular stimulation in man. Demonstrated evidence of vestibular prevalence and role in motion laterality].

Authors:  M Lacour; M Bonnet; J P Roll
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1974 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Head movement restriction and postural stability in patients with compensated unilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  M Karlberg; M Magnusson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Anthropometric assessment of 10-y changes in body composition in the elderly.

Authors:  Virginia A Hughes; Ronenn Roubenoff; Michael Wood; Walter R Frontera; William J Evans; Maria A Fiatarone Singh
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects.

Authors:  W M Paulus; A Straube; T Brandt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  The vestibular system in the elderly: clinical implications.

Authors:  P D Sloane; R W Baloh; V Honrubia
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Inverse U-shaped curve for age dependency of torsional eye movement responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Klaus Jahn; Andrea Naessl; Erich Schneider; Michael Strupp; Thomas Brandt; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  10 in total

1.  Elderly Use Proprioception Rather than Visual and Vestibular Cues for Postural Motor Control.

Authors:  Isabella Katharina Wiesmeier; Daniela Dalin; Christoph Maurer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  Influence of the Plantar Cutaneous Information in Postural Regulation Depending on the Age and the Physical Activity Status.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Thierry P Paillard
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Balance Training Enhances Vestibular Function and Reduces Overactive Proprioceptive Feedback in Elderly.

Authors:  Isabella K Wiesmeier; Daniela Dalin; Anja Wehrle; Urs Granacher; Thomas Muehlbauer; Joerg Dietterle; Cornelius Weiller; Albert Gollhofer; Christoph Maurer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Vestibular Adaptations Induced by Gentle Physical Activity Are Reduced Among Older Women.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 5.  Neuromuscular or Sensory Electrical Stimulation for Reconditioning Motor Output and Postural Balance in Older Subjects?

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 6.  Sensory electrical stimulation and postural balance: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Techniques and Methods for Testing the Postural Function in Healthy and Pathological Subjects.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard; Frédéric Noé
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Postural Effects of Vestibular Manipulation Depend on the Physical Activity Status.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Center of Pressure Motion After Calf Vibration Is More Random in Fallers Than Non-fallers: Prospective Study of Older Individuals.

Authors:  Wolbert van den Hoorn; Graham K Kerr; Jaap H van Dieën; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  High-gain observer-based nonlinear control scheme for biomechanical sit to stand movement in the presence of sensory feedback delays.

Authors:  Nadia Sultan; Asif Mahmood Mughal; Muhammad Najam Ul Islam; Fahad Mumtaz Malik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.