Literature DB >> 11756100

Using highly concentrated gadobutrol as an MR contrast agent in patients also requiring hemodialysis: safety and dialysability.

Bernd Tombach1, Christoph Bremer, Peter Reimer, Fritz Matzkies, Roland M Schaefer, Wolfgang Ebert, Viviane Geens, Jeffrey Eisele, Walter Heindel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the safety and dialysability of gadobutrol, a new, electrically neutral, and highly concentrated MR contrast agent, in patients who require hemodialysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with end-stage renal failure who required ongoing hemodialysis were enrolled in our prospective study. Gadobutrol (1 mol/L) was injected IV at randomly assigned doses of either 0.1 or 0.3 mmol of gadolinium per kilogram of body weight for contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Hematology, clinical chemistry, and vital signs were closely monitored at baseline and during an observation period of 120 hr after the IV injection of gadobutrol. To calculate the dialysability, blood samples were drawn before and after each of three hemodialysis sessions. Additional arterial and venous blood sampling was performed during the first hemodialysis session after 30 and 90 min.
RESULTS: No gadobutrol-related changes in hematology, clinical chemistry, or vital signs were detected at either dose level during the observation period. The mean and the standard deviation for the eliminated fraction of gadobutrol was 68.2% +/- 12.7% after a 3-hr hemodialysis session using a 1.2 m(2) low-flux polysulfone membrane. After three consecutive hemodialysis sessions, the total amount of gadobutrol eliminated increased to 98.0% +/- 1.8%. The mean clearance rates of gadobutrol were 126.1 +/- 17.8 mL/min and 126.6 +/- 24.5 mL/min at 30 and 90 min, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Gadobutrol is effectively removed by three hemodialysis sessions using a low-flux polysulfone membrane. Our study documents initial evidence that gadobutrol can be used safely in hemodialysis patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11756100     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of the pulmonary vasculature--an update.

Authors:  Mark R Pedersen; Mark T Fisher; Edwin J R van Beek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Gadobutrol: a review of its use for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in adults and children.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Updated guidelines for intravenous contrast use for CT and MRI.

Authors:  Kevin Huynh; Arthur H Baghdanian; Armonde A Baghdanian; Derek S Sun; K Pallav Kolli; Ronald J Zagoria
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-01-10

4.  Intra-individual, randomised comparison of the MRI contrast agents gadobutrol and gadoterate in imaging the distal lower limb of patients with known or suspected osteomyelitis, evaluated in an off-site blinded read.

Authors:  Werner Pennekamp; Daniela Roggenland; Steffen Hering; Stefan Lemburg; Soeren Peters; Sabrina Sterl; Carsten Schwenke; Volkmar Nicolas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Intra-individual, randomised comparison of the MRI contrast agents gadobutrol versus gadoteridol in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours, evaluated in a blinded read.

Authors:  M Koenig; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; M Piontek; A Hentsch; P Spangenberg; C Schwenke; A Harders; L Heuser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  [Contrast agents in MRT. Substance, effects, pharmacology and validity].

Authors:  P Reimer; R Vosshenrich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in 471 patients with known or suspected renal lesions: results of a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase III trial.

Authors:  Bernd Tombach; Klaus Bohndorf; Wolfgang Brodtrager; Claus D Claussen; Christoph Düber; Michael Galanski; Eckhardt Grabbe; Giacomo Gortenuti; Michael Kuhn; Walter Gross-Fengels; Renate Hammerstingl; Brigitte Happel; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Gregor Jung; Thomas Kittner; Roberto Lagalla; Philipp Lengsfeld; Reinhard Loose; Raymond H G Oyen; Pietro Pavlica; Christiane Pering; Roberto Pozzi-Mucelli; Thorsten Persigehl; Peter Reimer; Nomdo S Renken; Götz M Richter; Ernst J Rummeny; Fritz Schäfer; Malgorzata Szczerbo-Trojanowska; Andrzej Urbanik; Thomas J Vogl; Paul Hajek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Currently used non-specific extracellular MR contrast media.

Authors:  M F Bellin; M Vasile; S Morel-Precetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Gadobutrol in India-A Comprehensive Review of Safety and Efficacy.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Nicoletta Anzalone
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2017-09-11

10.  Novel sorbents for removal of gadolinium-based contrast agents in sorbent dialysis and hemoperfusion: preventive approaches to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Authors:  Wassana Yantasee; Glen E Fryxell; George A Porter; Kanda Pattamakomsan; Vichaya Sukwarotwat; Wilaiwan Chouyyok; View Koonsiripaiboon; Jide Xu; Kenneth N Raymond
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.