Literature DB >> 11751814

Molecular organization of intrinsic restriction and modification genes BsuM of Bacillus subtilis Marburg.

Hideyuki Ohshima1, Satoshi Matsuoka, Kei Asai, Yoshito Sadaie.   

Abstract

Transcriptional analysis and disruption of five open reading frames (ORFs), ydiO, ydiP, ydiR, ydiS, and ydjA, in the prophage 3 region of the chromosome of Bacillus subtilis Marburg revealed that they are component genes of the intrinsic BsuM restriction and modification system of this organism. The classical mutant strain RM125, which lacks the restriction and modification system of B. subtilis Marburg, lacks the prophage 3 region carrying these five ORFs. These ORFs constitute two operons, the ydiO-ydiP operon and the ydiR-ydiS-ydjA operon, both of which are expressed during the logarithmic phase of growth. The predicted gene products YdiO and YdiP are the orthologues of cytosine DNA methyltransferases. The predicted YdiS product is an orthologue of restriction nucleases, while the predicted YdiR and YdjA products have no apparent paralogues and orthologues whose functions are known. Disruption of the ydiR-ydiS-ydjA operon resulted in enhanced transformation by plasmid DNA carrying multiple BsuM target sequences. Disruption of ydiO or ydiP function requires disruption of at least one of the following genes on the chromosome: ydiR, ydiS, and ydjA. The degrees of methylation of the BsuM target sequences on chromosomal DNAs were estimated indirectly by determining the susceptibility to digestion with XhoI (an isoschizomer of BsuM) of DNAs extracted from the disruptant strains. Six XhoI (BsuM) sites were examined. XhoI digested at the XhoI sites in the DNAs from disruptants with disruptions in both operons, while XhoI did not digest at the XhoI sites in the DNAs from the wild-type strain or from the disruptants with disruptions in the ydiR-ydiS-ydjA operon. Therefore, the ydiO-ydiP operon and the ydiR-ydiS-ydjA operon are considered operons that are responsible for BsuM modification and BsuM restriction, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11751814      PMCID: PMC139560          DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.2.381-389.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  38 in total

1.  Evidence of horizontal transfer of the EcoO109I restriction-modification gene to Escherichia coli chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  K Kita; J Tsuda; T Kato; K Okamoto; H Yanase; M Tanaka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  J F Tomb; O White; A R Kerlavage; R A Clayton; G G Sutton; R D Fleischmann; K A Ketchum; H P Klenk; S Gill; B A Dougherty; K Nelson; J Quackenbush; L Zhou; E F Kirkness; S Peterson; B Loftus; D Richardson; R Dodson; H G Khalak; A Glodek; K McKenney; L M Fitzegerald; N Lee; M D Adams; E K Hickey; D E Berg; J D Gocayne; T R Utterback; J D Peterson; J M Kelley; M D Cotton; J M Weidman; C Fujii; C Bowman; L Watthey; E Wallin; W S Hayes; M Borodovsky; P D Karp; H O Smith; C M Fraser; J C Venter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSFORMATION IN BACILLUS SUBTILIS.

Authors:  C Anagnostopoulos; J Spizizen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1961-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Cloning, sequence and characterization of m5C-methyltransferase-encoding gene, hgiDIIM (GTCGAC), from Herpetosiphon giganteus strain Hpa2.

Authors:  A Düsterhöft; M Kröger
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1991-09-30       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Restriction and modification in Bacillus subtilis: sequence specificities of restriction/modification systems BsuM, BsuE, and BsuF.

Authors:  S Jentsch
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Efficient isolation of genes by using antibody probes.

Authors:  R A Young; R W Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Host controlled modification and restriction in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  T Shibata; T Ando
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1974

8.  Glucitol induction in Bacillus subtilis is mediated by a regulatory factor, GutR.

Authors:  R Ye; S N Rehemtulla; S L Wong
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  DNA methyltransferase of Bacillus subtilis Marburg: purification, properties and further evidence of specificity.

Authors:  S Guha
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1988-12-25       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  In vivo restriction by LlaI is encoded by three genes, arranged in an operon with llaIM, on the conjugative Lactococcus plasmid pTR2030.

Authors:  D J O'Sullivan; K Zagula; T R Klaenhammer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  19 in total

1.  Methyltransferase DnmA is responsible for genome-wide N6-methyladenosine modifications at non-palindromic recognition sites in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Taylor M Nye; Lieke A van Gijtenbeek; Amanda G Stevens; Jeremy W Schroeder; Justin R Randall; Lindsay A Matthews; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Bacillus subtilis genome diversity.

Authors:  Ashlee M Earl; Richard Losick; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Genome-Wide Analysis of ResD, NsrR, and Fur Binding in Bacillus subtilis during Anaerobic Fermentative Growth by In Vivo Footprinting.

Authors:  Onuma Chumsakul; Divya P Anantsri; Tai Quirke; Taku Oshima; Kensuke Nakamura; Shu Ishikawa; Michiko M Nakano
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Computational analysis of cysteine and methionine metabolism and its regulation in dairy starter and related bacteria.

Authors:  Mengjin Liu; Celine Prakash; Arjen Nauta; Roland J Siezen; Christof Francke
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Genetic composition of the Bacillus subtilis SOS system.

Authors:  Nora Au; Elke Kuester-Schoeck; Veena Mandava; Laura E Bothwell; Susan P Canny; Karen Chachu; Sierra A Colavito; Shakierah N Fuller; Eli S Groban; Laura A Hensley; Theresa C O'Brien; Amish Shah; Jessica T Tierney; Louise L Tomm; Thomas M O'Gara; Alexi I Goranov; Alan D Grossman; Charles M Lovett
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Evidence for horizontal transfer of the EcoT38I restriction-modification gene to chromosomal DNA by the P2 phage and diversity of defective P2 prophages in Escherichia coli TH38 strains.

Authors:  Keiko Kita; Hideaki Kawakami; Hiroaki Tanaka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  A viable Bacillus subtilis strain without functional extracytoplasmic function sigma genes.

Authors:  Kei Asai; Keisuke Ishiwata; Kunihiko Matsuzaki; Yoshito Sadaie
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The N-terminal domain of Staphylothermus marinus McrB shares structural homology with PUA-like RNA binding proteins.

Authors:  Christopher J Hosford; Myfanwy C Adams; Yiming Niu; Joshua S Chappie
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.867

9.  Engineering clostridium strain to accept unmethylated DNA.

Authors:  Hongjun Dong; Yanping Zhang; Zongjie Dai; Yin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genome comparison and context analysis reveals putative mobile forms of restriction-modification systems and related rearrangements.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Furuta; Kentaro Abe; Ichizo Kobayashi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.