Literature DB >> 29086099

Horizontal mixture model for competing risks: a method used in waitlisted renal transplant candidates.

Katy Trébern-Launay1,2,3,4, Michèle Kessler5, Sahar Bayat-Makoei6, Anne-Hélène Quérard1,2,3,7, Serge Briançon8, Magali Giral1,2,3,4, Yohann Foucher9,10.   

Abstract

When a patient is registered on renal transplant waiting list, she/he expects a clear information on the likelihood of being transplanted. Nevertheless, this event is in competition with death and usual models for competing events are difficult to interpret for non-specialists. We used a horizontal mixture model. Data were extracted from two French dialysis and transplantation registries. The "Ile-de-France" region was used for external validation. The other patients were randomly divided for training and internal validation. Seven variables were associated with decreased long-term probability of transplantation: age over 40 years, comorbidities (diabetes, cardiovascular disease, malignancy), dialysis longer than 1 year before registration and blood groups O or B. We additionally demonstrated longer mean time-to-transplantation for recipients under the age of 50, overweight recipients, recipients with blood group O or B and with pre-transplantation anti-HLA class I or II immunization. Our model can be used to predict the long-term probability of transplantation and the time in dialysis among transplanted patients, two easily interpretable parts. Discriminative capacities were validated on both the internal and external (AUC at 5 years = 0.72, 95% CI from 0.68 to 0.76) validation samples. However, calibration issues were highlighted and illustrated the importance of complete re-estimation of the model for other countries. We illustrated the ease of interpretation of horizontal modelling, which constitutes an alternative to sub-hazard or cause-specific approaches. Nevertheless, it would be useful to test this in practice, for instance by questioning both the physicians and the patients. We believe that this model should also be used in other chronic diseases, for both etiologic and prognostic studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competing events; Kidney transplantation; Mixture model; Prognostic study

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29086099     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-017-0322-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  22 in total

1.  Explaining risk factors to patients during a general practice consultation. Conveying group-based epidemiological knowledge to individual patients.

Authors:  H Hollnagel
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Interpretability and importance of functionals in competing risks and multistate models.

Authors:  Per Kragh Andersen; Niels Keiding
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Cause-specific cumulative incidence estimation and the fine and gray model under both left truncation and right censoring.

Authors:  Ronald B Geskus
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Survival Analysis in the Presence of Competing Risks: The Example of Waitlisted Kidney Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  R Sapir-Pichhadze; M Pintilie; K J Tinckam; A Laupacis; A G Logan; J Beyene; S J Kim
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994-2003.

Authors:  Gabriel M Danovitch; David J Cohen; Matthew R Weir; Peter G Stock; William M Bennett; Laura L Christensen; Randall S Sung
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks.

Authors:  Paul Blanche; Jean-François Dartigues; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  The ethics of end-of-life care for patients with ESRD.

Authors:  Sara N Davison
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Individual survival time prediction using statistical models.

Authors:  R Henderson; N Keiding
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Competing risk regression models for epidemiologic data.

Authors:  Bryan Lau; Stephen R Cole; Stephen J Gange
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  1 in total

1.  Renal transplantation outcomes in obese patients: a French cohort-based study.

Authors:  Y Foucher; M Lorent; L Albano; S Roux; V Pernin; M Le Quintrec; C Legendre; F Buron; E Morelon; S Girerd; M Ladrière; D Glotz; C Lefaucher; C Kerleau; J Dantal; J Branchereau; M Giral
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.388

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.