Literature DB >> 33686613

Patient Perspectives on the Risk-Based NLST Outcomes Tool for Lung Cancer Screening.

Megan C Roberts1, Elizabeth L Seaman2, William M P Klein2, Rebecca A Ferrer2, Paul K J Han3, Hormuzd A Katki2, Stephanie R Land2, Robert A Liotta4,5, Joel A Nations6,7, P Gabriel Peterson4,5.   

Abstract

Researchers at the NCI have developed the Risk-Based NLST Outcomes Tool (RNOT), an online tool that calculates risk of lung cancer diagnosis and death with and without lung cancer screening, and false-positive risk estimates. This tool has the potential to facilitate shared decision making for screening. The objective of this study was to examine how current heavy and former smokers understand and respond to personalized risk estimates from the RNOT. Individuals who were eligible for lung cancer screening and were visiting Walter Reed National Military Medical Center were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview to assess their experiences with and perceptions of the RNOT. Results were analyzed using template analysis. Participants found their risk of lung cancer death to be lower than anticipated and were confused by changes in risk for lung cancer diagnosis with and without screening. Most participants indicated that the RNOT would be helpful in making screening decisions, despite reporting that there was no maximum risk for a false positive that would lead them to forgo lung cancer screening. Participants provided actionable needs and recommendations to optimize this tool. Risk-based screening tools may enhance shared decision making. The RNOT is being updated to incorporate these findings.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer; Screening; Shared decision making; Smoking

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33686613      PMCID: PMC9190214          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-01977-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   1.771


  9 in total

1.  Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; David S Gierada; William Black; Reginald Munden; Hrudaya Nath; Denise Aberle; Ella Kazerooni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Risk communication and older people-understanding of probability and risk information by medical inpatients aged 75 years and older.

Authors:  R Fuller; N Dudley; J Blacktop
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Linda S Kinsinger; Charles Anderson; Jane Kim; Martha Larson; Stephanie H Chan; Heather A King; Kathryn L Rice; Christopher G Slatore; Nichole T Tanner; Kathleen Pittman; Robert J Monte; Rebecca B McNeil; Janet M Grubber; Michael J Kelley; Dawn Provenzale; Santanu K Datta; Nina S Sperber; Lottie K Barnes; David H Abbott; Kellie J Sims; Richard L Whitley; R Ryanne Wu; George L Jackson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Development and Validation of Risk Models to Select Ever-Smokers for CT Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Stephanie A Kovalchik; Christine D Berg; Li C Cheung; Anil K Chaturvedi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Risk perceptions and health behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca Ferrer; William M Klein
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2015-10-01

6.  The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Brian Zikmund-Fisher; Peter Ubel; Aleksandra Jancovic; Todd Lucas; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-08-27

7.  Perceptions of health risks of cigarette smoking: A new measure reveals widespread misunderstanding.

Authors:  Jon A Krosnick; Neil Malhotra; Cecilia Hyunjung Mo; Eduardo F Bruera; LinChiat Chang; Josh Pasek; Randall K Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Lung Cancer Screening and Smoking Cessation Clinical Trials. SCALE (Smoking Cessation within the Context of Lung Cancer Screening) Collaboration.

Authors:  Anne M Joseph; Alexander J Rothman; Daniel Almirall; Abbie Begnaud; Caroline Chiles; Paul M Cinciripini; Steven S Fu; Amanda L Graham; Bruce R Lindgren; Anne C Melzer; Jamie S Ostroff; Elizabeth L Seaman; Kathryn L Taylor; Benjamin A Toll; Steven B Zeliadt; David M Vock
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 30.528

9.  The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research.

Authors:  Joanna Brooks; Serena McCluskey; Emma Turley; Nigel King
Journal:  Qual Res Psychol       Date:  2014-09-02
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Executive Summary: Screening for Lung Cancer: Chest Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.410

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.