Literature DB >> 26233526

An implicit spatial memory alignment effect.

Mélanie Cerles1, Alice Gomez, Stéphane Rousset.   

Abstract

The memory alignment effect is the advantage of reasoning from a perspective which is aligned with the frame of reference used to encode an environment in memory. It usually occurs when participants have to consciously take a perspective to perform a spatial memory task. The present experiment assesses whether the memory alignment effect can occur without requiring to consciously take a given perspective, when the misaligned perspective is only perceptively provided. In others words, does the memory alignment effect still arise when it is only implicitly prompted? Thirty participants learned a sequence of four objects' positions in a room from a north-as-up survey perspective. During the testing phase, they had to point to the direction of a target object from another object ('the reference') with a fixed north-up orientation. The background behind the reference object displayed either a uniform color (control condition) or a misaligned ground-level perspective. The latter displayed a reference object's position information which was either congruent with the studied environment (congruent misaligned condition) or incongruent (incongruent misaligned condition). Mean pointing errors were higher in the congruent misaligned condition than in the control condition, whereas the incongruent misaligned condition did not differ from the control one. The present study shows that the memory alignment effect can arise without requiring a conscious misaligned perspective taking. Moreover, the perceived misaligned perspective must share the same spatial content as the memorized spatial representation in order to induce an alignment effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233526     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-015-0694-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  8 in total

Review 1.  Six views of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Margaret Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Fixed versus dynamic orientations in environmental learning from ground-level and aerial perspectives.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; Holly A Pippitt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-07

Review 4.  Multiple systems of spatial memory and action.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-09-27

5.  Systems of spatial reference in human memory.

Authors:  A L Shelton; T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara; Christine M Valiquette; Bjorn Rump
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine.

Authors:  Neil Burgess
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery.

Authors:  Patrick Byrne; Suzanna Becker; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.