Literature DB >> 11740871

An economic analysis of surgical wound infection.

J Reilly1, S Twaddle, J McIntosh, L Kean.   

Abstract

Audit of surgical wound infection is not only an outcome indicator, but also an important aspect of infection control. The literature suggests an expensive 'gold standard' involving a full-time audit nurse collecting prospective data, including a 30-day follow-up into the community.Our study indicates that the cost of surgical wound infection is three-fold: cost to the hospital, the community services and the patient. Although the greatest costs were due to prolonged stay or re-admission to hospital (just under pound90 000), costs to the community and patient cannot be ignored. Hospital expenditure varied according to the type of operation. The study clearly demonstrated the potential cost savings to be highlighted by this type of audit. Copyright 2001 The Hospital Infection Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11740871     DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  19 in total

1.  [The current pathogen spectrum--what are we fighting against?].

Authors:  S Scheithauer; H Häfner; S W Lemmen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Sharon B Chang; Robert L Askew; Yan Xing; Storm Weaver; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jeffrey E Lee; Richard Royal; Anthony Lucci; Merrick I Ross; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economic burden.

Authors:  David J Leaper; Harry van Goor; Jacqueline Reilly; Nicola Petrosillo; Heinrich K Geiss; Antonio J Torres; Anne Berger
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Costs of hospital-acquired infection and transferability of the estimates: a systematic review.

Authors:  H Fukuda; J Lee; Y Imanaka
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic administration for breast cancer surgery in overweight or obese patients: research highlight.

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2013-05

6.  Update on the Epidemiology and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections.

Authors:  Tae Chong; Robert Sawyer
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 7.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  Determining risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence: a literature review.

Authors:  Kylie Sandy-Hodgetts; Keryln Carville; Gavin D Leslie
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dana Figueroa; Victoria Chapman Jauk; Jeff M Szychowski; Rachel Garner; Joseph R Biggio; William W Andrews; John Hauth; Alan T N Tita
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Attributable costs of surgical site infection and endometritis after low transverse cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Anne M Butler; Denise M Willers; Gilad A Gross; Barton H Hamilton; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.