Literature DB >> 11737300

Histopathology and the 'third great lie'. When is an image not a scientifically authentic image?

S K Suvarna1, M A Ansary.   

Abstract

This article considers the issues of image manipulation within the context of electronic/digital images. The possibility for such alterations has occurred with the increasing availability of simple and cheap computer software, permitting modification of digitized images as a whole, or in part. The concepts of acceptable, through to unacceptable, manipulations are discussed using macroscopic and histological illustration examples. The legal and editorial problems that this poses for medical and scientific publishing are also discussed, alongside examples of previous fraudulent image publications and the historical context of valid scientific images.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11737300     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2001.01312.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  8 in total

1.  Correction of uneven illumination (vignetting) in digital microscopy images.

Authors:  F J W-M Leong; M Brady; J O'D McGee
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The use of digital imaging, video conferencing, and telepathology in histopathology: a national survey.

Authors:  T Dennis; R D Start; S S Cross
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Digital images are data: and should be treated as such.

Authors:  Douglas W Cromey
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

4.  Performance of residents using digital images versus glass slides on certification examination in anatomical pathology: a mixed methods pilot study.

Authors:  Lorna Mirham; Christopher Naugler; Malcolm Hayes; Nadia Ismiil; Annie Belisle; Shachar Sade; Catherine Streutker; Christina MacMillan; Golnar Rasty; Snezana Popovic; Mariamma Joseph; Manal Gabril; Penny Barnes; Richard G Hegele; Beverley Carter; George M Yousef
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-02-25

5.  Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images.

Authors:  Douglas W Cromey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  Digital photography: a primer for pathologists.

Authors:  Roger S Riley; Jonathan M Ben-Ezra; Davis Massey; Rodney L Slyter; Gina Romagnoli
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Image standards in tissue-based diagnosis (diagnostic surgical pathology).

Authors:  Klaus Kayser; Jürgen Görtler; Torsten Goldmann; Ekkehard Vollmer; Peter Hufnagl; Gian Kayser
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Current usage and future trends in gross digital photography in Canada.

Authors:  Christopher L Horn; Lawrence DeKoning; Paul Klonowski; Christopher Naugler
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.