Literature DB >> 11737107

Short epithetic implants for orthodontic anchorage in the paramedian region of the palate. A clinical study.

T Bernhart1, J Freudenthaler, O Dörtbudak, H P Bantleon, G Watzek.   

Abstract

Orthodontic movement of teeth often requires maximum anchorage, so that additional resistance must be added to teeth to avoid reaction to reciprocal forces. Thus, use of endosseous implants may be a valuable alternative for ensuring stable intraoral anchorage. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of short epithetic implants for orthodontic anchorage in the paramedian region of the palate. Twenty-one patients (15 female, 6 male; mean age 25.8+/-9.9 yrs, min 12.7, max. 48.1) were included in this study. Following adequate preoperative planning, an implant system with reduced length, which had already been used for anchorage of epitheses, was placed in the paramedian region avoiding the anterior palatine suture. After a mean period of 4 months with unloaded healing, the implants were subjected to direct or indirect orthodontic loading. Despite varying bone quality and varying vertical bone volume in this region, adequate primary stability was achieved for all of the implants. No implant was lost during the healing period. Three out of the 21 implants placed were considered as failures. Two implants loosened shortly after the start of orthodontic loading. One of these was lost at a later stage due to peri-implant inflammation, while the other one was left in place during the 9-month follow-up period because no inflammation developed and this implant is still indirectly included in the orthodontic treatment. Another implant loosening was observed after 8.5 months following direct loading with 8 N. This implant was also lost due to peri-implant inflammation. The time-related survival probability was 84.8% after 22.9 months. As yet, 4 implants have been removed due to completion of orthodontic treatment. The results of this study indicate that short epithetic implants are suitable to achieve maximum anchorage in the paramedian region of the hard palate in orthodontic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11737107     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120611.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  9 in total

1.  Spectrum of indications for palatal implants in treatment concepts involving immediate and conventional loading.

Authors:  Britta A Jung; Winfried Harzer; Tomasz Gedrange; Martin Kunkel; Maximilian Moergel; Peter Diedrich; Gabriele Lüdicke; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Does thread design influence relative bone-to-implant contact rate of palatal implants?

Authors:  Britta A Jung; Martin Kunkel; Peter Göllner; Thomas Liechti; Maximilian Moergel; Robert Noelken; Peter Borbély; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Orthodontic treatment of gummy smile by maxillary total intrusion with a midpalatal absolute anchorage system.

Authors:  Ryoon-Ki Hong; Seung-Min Lim; Jung-Min Heo; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices.

Authors:  Seong Han; Mohamed Bayome; Jeongwon Lee; Yoon-Jin Lee; Hae-Hiang Song; Yoon-Ah Kook
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Mini-implants in the anchorage armamentarium: new paradigms in the orthodontics.

Authors:  Masaru Yamaguchi; Toshihiro Inami; Ko Ito; Kazutaka Kasai; Yasuhiro Tanimoto
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-06-05

6.  Relationship Between the Thickness of Cortical Bone at Maxillary Mid-palatal Area and Facial Height Using CBCT.

Authors:  Masume Johari; Farzaneh Kaviani; Arman Saeedi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-07-31

7.  A Novel Rat Model of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices: 3D Finite Element Analysis and In Vivo Validation.

Authors:  Neelambar Kaipatur; Yuchin Wu; Samer Adeeb; Thomas Stevenson; Paul Major; Michael Doschak
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-09-10

8.  Temporary anchorage device usage: a survey among Swiss orthodontists.

Authors:  Goran Markic; Christos Katsaros; Nikolaos Pandis; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of hard and soft tissue thicknesses in the midpalatal suture region to facilitate orthodontic mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Song-Hee Oh; Sae Rom Lee; Jin-Young Choi; Seong-Hun Kim; Eui-Hwan Hwang; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.