Literature DB >> 11033383

The dose-response relationship in phase I clinical trials and beyond: use, meaning, and assessment.

G Emilien1, W van Meurs, J M Maloteaux.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the relationships among dose, drug concentration in blood, and clinical response is important for the safe and effective use of drugs in individual patients. Recently, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling has been taking an increasingly important place in clinical pharmacology because of its role in the determination of the optimal dosage of a new drug. Its primary objective is also to identify the characterization and prediction of the time course of drug effects under physiological and pathological conditions. Dose-response studies are useful in Phase I for assessing drug tolerance and safety, and invaluable in Phase II for characterizing drug efficacy. Apart from the confirmation of efficacy, the acquired information may help to investigate the shape and location of the dose-response curve, the choice of an appropriate therapeutic starting dose, the identification of optimal strategies for individual dose adjustments, and the determination of a maximal dose beyond which additional benefit is unlikely to be obtained. Recent development of pharmacodynamic models such as the mechanism-based indirect effect model may permit the identification of the physiological component of drug action that is affected by disease, other medications, gender, and other variables. Assessment of dose response should be an integral component of drug development, with studies designed to assess dose response an inherent part of establishing the safety and efficacy of the drug. Drug development can be enhanced with a good understanding of dose-response characteristics and ultimately the benefit/risk ratio of a drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11033383     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-7258(00)00077-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0163-7258            Impact factor:   12.310


  6 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluations during early (phase II) drug development: a role for clinical trial simulations?

Authors:  D A Hughes; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.

Authors:  Jasper Dingemanse; Silke Appel-Dingemanse
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Exposure-response analysis reveals that clinically important toxicity difference can exist between bioequivalent carbamazepine tablets.

Authors:  Laszlo Tothfalusi; Szilvia Speidl; Laszlo Endrenyi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Clinical Trials for Disease-Modifying Therapies in Alzheimer's Disease: A Primer, Lessons Learned, and a Blueprint for the Future.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cummings; Aaron Ritter; Kate Zhong
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Effects of Shuanghuanglian oral liquids on patients with COVID-19: a randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled, multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Li Ni; Zheng Wen; Xiaowen Hu; Wei Tang; Haisheng Wang; Ling Zhou; Lujin Wu; Hong Wang; Chang Xu; Xizhen Xu; Zhichao Xiao; Zongzhe Li; Chene Li; Yujian Liu; Jialin Duan; Chen Chen; Dan Li; Runhua Zhang; Jinliang Li; Yongxiang Yi; Wei Huang; Yanyan Chen; Jianping Zhao; Jianping Zuo; Jianping Weng; Hualiang Jiang; Dao Wen Wang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 9.927

6.  Randomized clinical trials to identify optimal antibiotic treatment duration.

Authors:  C Robert Horsburgh; Kimberly M Shea; Patrick Phillips; Michael Lavalley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.