Literature DB >> 11735288

The use of mixed distribution models to determine bout criteria for analysis of animal behaviour.

M P Yeates1, B J Tolkamp, D J Allcroft, I Kyriazakis.   

Abstract

Feeding behaviour consists of feeding events, separated by non-feeding intervals. Feeding events are often clustered into bouts, which may be called meals. Grouping feeding events into meals requires the determination of a bout or meal criterion, that is, the longest interval accepted as part of a meal. Tolkamp & Kyriazakis (1999a) proposed a three-Gaussian model to estimate meal criteria. The three Gaussians each described the frequency distribution of the log(e)-transformed lengths of a population of intervals. These populations were thought to be: (1) short intervals within meals; (2) intervals within meals during which animals drink; (3) intervals between meals. This model predicted that the probability of an animal starting a meal would first increase, and then decrease with time since the last meal. This contrasts with expectations based on the satiety concept, which predicts that the probability of an animal starting a meal will increase with time since the last meal. This discrepancy is related to the symmetrical nature of the Gaussian distribution. Alternatively, the two-parameter Weibull distribution can take a skewed form and perhaps is more suitable to describe the different populations of intervals. In this study, models consisting of combinations of Gaussian and Weibull distributions were examined for their suitability to describe the observed feeding behaviour of cows. Weibulls did not improve the description of the populations of within-meal intervals, compared to Gaussians. However, the Weibull distribution was found to describe the between-meal population of intervals statistically better than the Gaussian. Additionally, this inclusion of a Weibull, as opposed to a Gaussian, resulted in predictions that were in better agreement with the satiety concept over the entire range of interval lengths observed. A model based on Gaussians to describe the within-meal populations of intervals and a Weibull to describe the population of between-meal intervals is, therefore, proposed. This model leads to biologically more satisfactory estimates of bout criteria than previous models and is likely to be applicable both across species and behaviours. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11735288     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  12 in total

1.  Characterization of feeding behavior traits in steers with divergent residual feed intake consuming a high-concentrate diet.

Authors:  Ira L Parsons; Jocelyn R Johnson; William C Kayser; Luis O Tedeschi; Gordon E Carstens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The microarchitecture of C. elegans behavior during lethargus: homeostatic bout dynamics, a typical body posture, and regulation by a central neuron.

Authors:  Shachar Iwanir; Nora Tramm; Stanislav Nagy; Charles Wright; Daniel Ish; David Biron
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 3.  Obsessive-compulsive disorder as a disturbance of security motivation: constraints on comorbidity.

Authors:  H Szechtman; E Z Woody
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.911

4.  Effect of increasing the level of alfalfa hay in finishing beef heifer diets on intake, sorting, and feeding behavior.

Authors:  A Madruga; L A González; E Mainau; J L Ruíz de la Torre; M Rodríguez-Prado; X Manteca; A Ferret
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Pigs Ferment Enzymatically Digestible Starch when it Is Substituted for Resistant Starch.

Authors:  Rik J J van Erp; Sonja de Vries; Theo A T G van Kempen; Walter J J Gerrits
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Phenotypic and genetic associations between feeding behavior and carcass merit in crossbred growing cattle.

Authors:  David N Kelly; Roy D Sleator; Craig P Murphy; Stephen B Conroy; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Increasing the content of physically effective fiber in high-concentrate diets fed to beef heifers affects intake, sorting behavior, time spent ruminating, and rumen pH.

Authors:  Lourdes Llonch; Lorena Castillejos; Alfred Ferret
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  How to use (and not to use) movement-based indices for quantifying foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Topaz Halperin; Michael Kalyuzhny; Dror Hawlena
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.781

9.  Feeding behaviour of artificially reared Romane lambs.

Authors:  I David; F Bouvier; E Ricard; J Ruesche; J-L Weisbecker
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Systematic analysis of feeding behaviors and their effects on feed efficiency in Pekin ducks.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Yahui Gao; Fangbin Lin; Jinping Hao; Fangxi Yang; Zhuocheng Hou
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.