Literature DB >> 34850954

Phenotypic and genetic associations between feeding behavior and carcass merit in crossbred growing cattle.

David N Kelly1,2, Roy D Sleator2, Craig P Murphy2, Stephen B Conroy3, Donagh P Berry1.   

Abstract

In growing cattle, the phenotypic and genetic relationships between feeding behavior and both live animal ultrasound measures and subsequent carcass merit are generally poorly characterized. The objective of the current study was to quantify the phenotypic and genetic associations between a plethora of feeding behavior traits with both pre-slaughter ultrasound traits and post-slaughter carcass credentials in crossbred Bos taurus cattle. Carcass data were available on 3,146 young bulls, steers, and heifers, of which 2,795 and 2,445 also had records for pre-slaughter ultrasound muscle depth and intramuscular fat percentage, respectively; a total of 1,548 steers and heifers had information on all of the feeding behavior, ultrasound, and carcass traits. Young bulls were fed concentrates, while steers and heifers were fed a total mixed ration. Feeding behavior traits were defined based on individual feed events or meal events (i.e., individual feed events grouped into meals). Animal linear mixed models were used to estimate (co)variance components. Phenotypic correlations between feeding behavior and both ultrasound and carcass traits were generally weak and not different from zero, although there were phenotypic correlations of 0.40, 0.26, and 0.37 between carcass weight and feeding rate, energy intake per feed event, and energy intake per meal, respectively. Genetically, cattle that had heavier carcass weights, better carcass conformation, or a higher dressing percentage fed for a shorter time per day (genetic correlations [±SE] of -0.46 ± 0.12, -0.39 ± 0.11, and -0.50 ± 0.10, respectively). Genetic correlations of 0.43 ± 0.12 and 0.68 ± 0.13 were estimated between dressing difference (i.e., differential between live weight pre-slaughter and carcass weight) and energy intake per feed event and energy intake per meal, respectively. Neither intramuscular fat percentage measured on live animals nor carcass fat score (i.e., a measure of subcutaneous fat cover of the carcass) was genetically associated with any of the feeding behavior traits. The genetic associations between some feeding behavior traits and both ultrasound and carcass traits herein suggested that indirect responses in the feeding behavior of growing cattle from selection for improved carcass merit would be expected. Such changes in feeding behavior patterns in cattle may be reduced by measuring and including feeding behavior in a multiple-trait selection index alongside carcass traits.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcass weight; genetic correlations; response to selection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34850954      PMCID: PMC8634464          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  To split behaviour into bouts, log-transform the intervals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  The use of mixed distribution models to determine bout criteria for analysis of animal behaviour.

Authors:  M P Yeates; B J Tolkamp; D J Allcroft; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 3.  Consequences of genetic change in farm animals on food intake and feeding behaviour.

Authors:  G Emmans; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.297

4.  Phenotypic and genetic relationships of feeding behavior with feed intake, growth performance, feed efficiency, and carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais steers.

Authors:  L Chen; F Mao; D H Crews; M Vinsky; C Li
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Genetic analysis of carcass traits in beef cattle using random regression models.

Authors:  T M Englishby; G Banos; K L Moore; M P Coffey; R D Evans; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Feed efficiency and carcass metrics in growing cattle1.

Authors:  David N Kelly; Craig Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Michelle M Judge; Stephen B Conroy; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Dressing percentage and the differential between live weight and carcass weight in cattle are influenced by both genetic and non-genetic factors1.

Authors:  Jessica M Coyne; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Genetic parameters for calving difficulty, stillbirth, and birth weight for Hereford and Charolais at first and later parities.

Authors:  S Eriksson; A Näisholm; K Johansson; J Philipsson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle.

Authors:  J D Nkrumah; D H Crews; J A Basarab; M A Price; E K Okine; Z Wang; C Li; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Validation of a beef cattle maternal breeding objective based on a cross-sectional analysis of a large national cattle database.

Authors:  Alan J Twomey; Andrew R Cromie; Noirin McHugh; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.