Literature DB >> 11733630

Comparison of body fluid distribution between chronic haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients as assessed by biophysical and biochemical methods.

J Plum1, G Schoenicke, W Kleophas, W Kulas, F Steffens, A Azem, B Grabensee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The control of extracellular volume is a key parameter for reducing hypertension and the incidence of cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients. In recent years bioimpedance measurement (BIA) has been proven as a non-invasive and accurate method for measuring intracellular and extracellular fluid spaces in man. In addition, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphatase (cGMP) concentrations have been shown to reflect central venous filling. Using these methods, we compared body fluid status between stable patients on haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
METHODS: Thirty-nine chronic haemodialysis patients, 43 chronic peritoneal dialysis patients and 22 healthy controls were included in the study. Multifrequency BIA was performed using the Xitron BIS4000B device (frequencies from 5 to 500 kHz were scanned and fitted) in patients before and after haemodialysis. Peritoneal dialysis patients were measured after drainage of the dialysate. Plasma ANP and cGMP levels were measured in plasma using a (125)I solid phase RIA. Serum albumin concentrations and serum osmolality were measured in all patients. The body fluid data were analysed in relation with the clinical findings.
RESULTS: Total body water (TBW) was 0.471+/-0.066 l/kg before haemodialysis and 0.466+/-0.054 l/kg after haemodialysis. Peritoneal dialysis patients had a TBW (0.498+/-0.063 l/kg) that was greater than the before and after dialysis values of haemodialysis patients. The extracellular body fluid (V(ecf)) was increased pre-haemodialysis. It was even greater in peritoneal dialysis patients compared with patients both pre- and post-haemodialysis (pre 0.276+/-0.037 l/kg; post 0.254+/-0.034 l/kg; peritoneal dialysis 0.293+/-0.042 l/kg, P<0.05). However, plasma ANP concentrations (representing intravascular filling) in peritoneal dialysis patients were comparable with post-haemodialysis values (284+/-191 pg/ml vs 286+/-144 pg/ml). The correlation coefficient between sysRR and V(ecf) was r=0.257 in haemodialysis (P=0.057) and r=0.258 in peritoneal dialysis (P<0.05). A significant negative correlation was found between serum albumin and V(ecf)/TBW in peritoneal dialysis patients (r= -0.624).
CONCLUSION: Body fluid analysis by BIA demonstrated that TBW and V(ecf) were increased in peritoneal dialysis patients, and were comparable or even greater than values found before haemodialysis. However, plasma ANP levels indicated that intravascular filling was not increased in peritoneal dialysis. The ratio of V(ecf) to TBW was correlated to systolic pressure and negatively to serum albumin in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11733630     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/16.12.2378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  19 in total

1.  Plasma volume, albumin, and fluid status in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Biju John; B Kay Tan; Stephen Dainty; Patrik Spanel; David Smith; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  The standard deviation of extracellular water/intracellular water is associated with all-cause mortality and technique failure in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jun-Ping Tian; Hong Wang; Feng-He Du; Tao Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of darbepoetin alfa in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients after intravenous administration.

Authors:  Hirotaka Takama; Hideji Tanaka; Daisuke Nakashima; Hiroyasu Ogata; Eiji Uchida; Tadao Akizawa; Shozo Koshikawa
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  [Peritoneal dialysis--an ideal initial dialysis mode].

Authors:  Heidi Puttinger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-07-02

5.  Volume control in diabetic and nondiabetic peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Hong-bing Gan; Meng-hua Chen; Bengt Lindholm; Tao Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Body composition monitor measurement technique for the detection of volume status in peritoneal dialysis patients: the effect of abdominal fullness.

Authors:  Savas Sipahi; Ender Hur; Saadet Demirtas; Ibrahim Kocayigit; Devrim Bozkurt; Ali Tamer; Huseyin Gunduz; Soner Duman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Influence of Different Payment Schemes on the Clinical Outcome in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Chun-yan Su; Xin-hong Lu; Tao Wang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Predictive value of brain natriuretic peptides in patients on peritoneal dialysis: results from the ADEMEX trial.

Authors:  Ramon Paniagua; Dante Amato; Salim Mujais; Edward Vonesh; Alfonso Ramos; Ricardo Correa-Rotter; Walter H Horl
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Dialysis adequacy in Chinese anuric peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Yeqing Shao; Sha Ma; Xiangyin Tian; Tao Wang; Jiayun Xu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Guided optimization of fluid status in haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Petr Machek; Tomas Jirka; Ulrich Moissl; Paul Chamney; Peter Wabel
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.