AIMS: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of darbepoetin alfa and covariate relationships in haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: Data were collected from 131 (63 HD and 68 PD) patients who received darbepoetin alfa intravenously. A total of 917 serum concentrations were available. The data were analysed by nonlinear mixed effect modelling using NONMEM with a model including endogenous erythropoietin production. In addition, the final model was evaluated using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: The selected basic model was a two-compartment model with a combination of additive and the constant coefficient of variation error models. The significant covariates were weight (WT) for clearance (CL) and the volume of central compartment (V(1)), and the dialysis technique (DIA) for V(1). The typical values of CL and V(1) were 0.0807 l h(-1) and 2.51 l, respectively. V(1) in PD patients was 17% higher than in HD patients. With the introduction of WT in CL and WT and DIA in V(1), interindividual variability decreased from 27.1% to 20.6% in CL and from 29.1% to 21.8% in V(1). The mean parameter estimates from the bootstrap datasets were similar to those from the original dataset. Evaluation by bootstrapping showed that the final model was stable. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present analysis suggest no dosage regimen change is warranted for darbepoetin alfa in HD and PD patients over the range of distribution of covariates included in this study.
AIMS: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of darbepoetin alfa and covariate relationships in haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: Data were collected from 131 (63 HD and 68 PD) patients who received darbepoetin alfa intravenously. A total of 917 serum concentrations were available. The data were analysed by nonlinear mixed effect modelling using NONMEM with a model including endogenous erythropoietin production. In addition, the final model was evaluated using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: The selected basic model was a two-compartment model with a combination of additive and the constant coefficient of variation error models. The significant covariates were weight (WT) for clearance (CL) and the volume of central compartment (V(1)), and the dialysis technique (DIA) for V(1). The typical values of CL and V(1) were 0.0807 l h(-1) and 2.51 l, respectively. V(1) in PDpatients was 17% higher than in HDpatients. With the introduction of WT in CL and WT and DIA in V(1), interindividual variability decreased from 27.1% to 20.6% in CL and from 29.1% to 21.8% in V(1). The mean parameter estimates from the bootstrap datasets were similar to those from the original dataset. Evaluation by bootstrapping showed that the final model was stable. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present analysis suggest no dosage regimen change is warranted for darbepoetin alfa in HD and PDpatients over the range of distribution of covariates included in this study.
Authors: Steve Elliott; Tony Lorenzini; Sheilah Asher; Ken Aoki; David Brankow; Lynette Buck; Leigh Busse; David Chang; Janis Fuller; James Grant; Natasha Hernday; Martha Hokum; Sylvia Hu; Andrew Knudten; Nancy Levin; Renee Komorowski; Frank Martin; Rachell Navarro; Timothy Osslund; Gary Rogers; Norma Rogers; Geri Trail; Joan Egrie Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2003-03-03 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: J Plum; G Schoenicke; W Kleophas; W Kulas; F Steffens; A Azem; B Grabensee Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Gary Lerner; Arundhati S Kale; Bradley A Warady; Kathy Jabs; Timothy E Bunchman; Anne Heatherington; Kurt Olson; Louise Messer-Mann; Bradley J Maroni Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2002-09-14 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Michael Allon; Kenneth Kleinman; Michael Walczyk; Charles Kaupke; Louise Messer-Mann; Kurt Olson; Anne C Heatherington; Bradley J Maroni Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jessica K Roberts; Chris Stockmann; Robert M Ward; Joanna Beachy; Mariana C Baserga; Michael G Spigarelli; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 6.447