Literature DB >> 11730254

Diagnosis of osteoporosis and fracture threshold in men.

J A Kanis1, O Johnell, A Oden, C De Laet, D Mellstrom.   

Abstract

This review examines the hypothesis that there are gender differences in the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk. Prospective studies of spine and hip fracture risk drawn from population samples suggest that the fracture risk increases as BMD decreases in men in the same way as that described in women. Moreover, for any given BMD at the spine, heel, or proximal femur the risk in men is similar to that in women. Although data are limited, prior fragility fractures increase subsequent fracture risks in both men and women. These studies suggest that the same BMD criteria used to diagnose osteoporosis in women can be applied to men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11730254     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-001-1046-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  19 in total

Review 1.  The perspective of the International Osteoporosis Foundation on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Ego Seeman; Olof Johnell; Rene Rizzoli; Pierre Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Relationship of femoral neck areal bone mineral density to volumetric bone mineral density, bone size, and femoral strength in men and women.

Authors:  B Srinivasan; D L Kopperdahl; S Amin; E J Atkinson; J Camp; R A Robb; B L Riggs; E S Orwoll; L J Melton; T M Keaveny; S Khosla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Recommendations for an update of the current (2001) regulatory requirements for registration of drugs to be used in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and in men.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Reginster; Eric Abadie; Pierre Delmas; René Rizzoli; Willard Dere; Philippevan der Auwera; Bernard Avouac; Maria-Luisa Brandi; Anastasia Daifotis; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Gonzalo Calvo; Olof Johnell; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Gottfried Kreutz; Andrea Laslop; Fritz Lekkerkerker; Bruce Mitlak; Per Nilsson; John Orloff; Mary Smillie; Andrew Taylor; Yannis Tsouderos; Dominique Ethgen; Bruno Flamion
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Skeletal fragility definition.

Authors:  Paolo Tranquilli Leali; Francesco Muresu; Alessandro Melis; Adriano Ruggiu; Alexandros Zachos; Carlo Doria
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-05

6.  Quality of life, morbidity, and mortality after low trauma hip fracture in men.

Authors:  I Pande; D L Scott; T W O'Neill; C Pritchard; A D Woolf; M J Davis
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01

8.  Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in men and women: a study based on data from Sweden.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Anders Oden; Frederik Borgstrom; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Fracture prevention in men.

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Philip Sambrook; Willem Lems
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Femoral and whole-body bone mineral density in middle-aged and older Norwegian men and women: suitability of the reference values.

Authors:  Clara Gram Gjesdal; Sylvi J Aanderud; Hans-Jacob Haga; Johan G Brun; Grethe S Tell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.