Literature DB >> 14966666

Femoral and whole-body bone mineral density in middle-aged and older Norwegian men and women: suitability of the reference values.

Clara Gram Gjesdal1, Sylvi J Aanderud, Hans-Jacob Haga, Johan G Brun, Grethe S Tell.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) in a population-based sample of middle-aged and older Norwegians, with reference values provided by the manufacturer of the densitometer (Lunar) in order to evaluate whether these reference values are suitable for Norwegians. Additional aims were to estimate the prevalence of osteoporosis. Bone mineral density of the hip and total body was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 2303 men and 3105 women 47-50 and 71-75 years old, respectively, in western Norway, as part of the Hordaland Health Study (HUSK). Of these, 3403 white individuals were free of medications or diseases known to influence bone metabolism (reference group). Compared with the Lunar reference population, men and older women had a slightly but significantly lower BMD of trochanter and total femur and middle aged women had significantly higher total body BMD. Except for the higher mean BMD of total body among middle-aged women and the uniformly lower BMD values of Ward's triangle, the deviations from the reference values of the manufacturer were less than 4%. Approximately 2.6% of middle-aged men vs 0.9% of middle-aged women were classified as osteoporotic on the basis of BMD of femoral neck. While the BMD values for femoral neck in this healthy Norwegian population are similar to the reference population of Lunar, the values of trochanter and total femur are lower in all groups except middle-aged women; however, the discrepancies are not of sufficient magnitude to warrant rejection of this commonly used database among Norwegians. Use of the young adult means from the Lunar reference database classified a higher proportion of middle-aged men than women as osteoporotic and osteopenic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14966666     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1573-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  24 in total

1.  Bone density of the spine and femur in adult white females.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom.

Authors:  S Kolta; P Ravaud; J Fechtenbaum; M Dougados; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: the OFELY cohort.

Authors:  M E Arlot; E Sornay-Rendu; P Garnero; B Vey-Marty; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Bone mineral normative data in Malmö, Sweden. Comparison with reference data and hip fracture incidence in other ethnic groups.

Authors:  M K Karlsson; P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson; K Akesson; K J Obrant
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1993-04

7.  Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  A Tenenhouse; L Joseph; N Kreiger; S Poliquin; T M Murray; L Blondeau; C Berger; D A Hanley; J C Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Reduced bone mineral density in male rheumatoid arthritis patients: frequencies and associations with demographic and disease variables in ninety-four patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis Register.

Authors:  G Haugeberg; T Uhlig; J A Falch; J I Halse; T K Kvien
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-12

9.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  18 in total

1.  Burden of osteoporosis in adults in Korea: a national health insurance database study.

Authors:  Hyung Jin Choi; Chan Soo Shin; Yong-Chan Ha; Sunmee Jang; Sun-Mee Jang; Suhyun Jang; Su-Hyun Jang; Chanmi Park; Chan Mi Park; Hyun-Koo Yoon; Seong-Su Lee
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Bone mineral density in Norwegian premenopausal women.

Authors:  Elin Kolle; Monica Klungland Torstveit; Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Age curves of bone mineral density at the distal radius and calcaneus in Koreans.

Authors:  Jin-Young Min; Kyoung-Bok Min; Domyung Paek; Daehee Kang; Sung-Il Cho
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Bone mineral density at the hip in Norwegian women and men--prevalence of osteoporosis depends on chosen references: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Nina Emaus; Tone K Omsland; Luai Awad Ahmed; Guri Grimnes; Monica Sneve; Gro K Berntsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  Lisa Forsén; Gro K Rosvold Berntsen; Haakon E Meyer; Grethe S Tell; Vinjar Fønnebø
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Low-energy distal radius fractures in middle-aged and elderly men and women--the burden of osteoporosis and fracture risk : A study of 1794 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J Øyen; C G Gjesdal; C Brudvik; L M Hove; E M Apalset; H C Gulseth; G Haugeberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Regional differences in hip bone mineral density levels in Norway: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  T K Omsland; C G Gjesdal; N Emaus; G S Tell; H E Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bone mineral density determinations by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the management of patients with Marfan syndrome--some factors which affect the measurement.

Authors:  Philip F Giampietro; Margaret G E Peterson; Robert Schneider; Jessica G Davis; Stephen W Burke; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Charles M Mueller; Cathleen L Raggio
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-02

9.  Bone mass, bone markers and prevalence of fractures in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Lena Lande Wekre; Erik F Eriksen; Jan A Falch
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 10.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in South Korea.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Byung-Ho Yoon; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.