Literature DB >> 2714644

Genic differentiation and origin of Robertsonian populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus Rutty).

J Britton-Davidian, J H Nadeau, H Croset, L Thaler.   

Abstract

This paper examines the relation between chromosomal and nuclear-gene divergence in 28 wild populations of the house mouse semi-species, Mus musculus domesticus, in Western Europe and North Africa. Besides describing the karyotypes of 15 of these populations and comparing them to those of 13 populations for which such information was already known, it reports the results of an electrophoretic survey of proteins encoded by 34 nuclear loci in all 28 populations. Karyotypic variation in this taxon involves only centric (or Robertsonian) fusions which often differ in arm combination and number between chromosomal races. The electrophoretic analysis showed that the amount of genic variation within Robertsonian (Rb) populations was similar to that for all-acrocentric populations, i.e. bearing the standard karyotype. Moreover, divergence between the two types of populations was extremely low. These results imply that centric fusions in mice have not modified either the level or the nature of genic variability. The genetic similarity between Rb and all-acrocentric populations is not attributed to the persistence of gene flow, since multiple fusions cause marked reproductive isolation. Rather, we attribute this extreme similarity to the very recent origin of chromosomal races in Europe. Furthermore, genic diversity measures suggest that geographically separated Rb populations have in situ and independent origins. Thus, Rb translocations are probably not unique events, but originated repeatedly. Two models are presented to explain how the rapid fixation of a series of chromosomal rearrangements can occur in a population without lowering variability in the nuclear genes. The first model assumes that chromosomal mutation rates are between 10(-3) and 10(-4) and that populations underwent a series of transient bottlenecks in which the effective population size did not fall below 35. In the second model, genic variability is restored following severe bottlenecks, through gene flow and recombination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2714644     DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300027841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  14 in total

1.  Whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) in a feral population of mice.

Authors:  R Castiglia; E Capanna
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Fertility assessment in hybrids between monobrachially homologous Rb races of the house mouse from the island of Madeira: implications for modes of chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  A C Nunes; J Catalan; J Lopez; M da Graça Ramalhinho; M da Luz Mathias; J Britton-Davidian
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Spatio-temporal variation in the structure of a chromosomal polymorphism zone in the house mouse.

Authors:  N Medarde; M J López-Fuster; F Muñoz-Muñoz; J Ventura
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Genetic distinctiveness of a village population of house mice: relevance to speciation and chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  S Fraguedakis-Tsolis; H C Hauffe; J B Searle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Selection against Robertsonian fusions involving housekeeping genes in the house mouse: integrating data from gene expression arrays and chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Marta Farré; Montserrat Ponsà; Terence J Robinson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Female meiosis drives karyotypic evolution in mammals.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; C Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Nucleotide variation in wild and inbred mice.

Authors:  Tovah Salcedo; Armando Geraldes; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Chromosomal speciation in mice: a cytogenetic analysis of recombination.

Authors:  Valeria Merico; Mabel D Giménez; Chiara Vasco; Maurizio Zuccotti; Jeremy B Searle; Heidi C Hauffe; Silvia Garagna
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 9.  The Robertsonian phenomenon in the house mouse: mutation, meiosis and speciation.

Authors:  Silvia Garagna; Jesus Page; Raul Fernandez-Donoso; Maurizio Zuccotti; Jeremy B Searle
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Swimming navigation, open-field activity, and extrapolation behavior of two inbred mouse strains with Robertsonian translocation of chromosomes 8 and 17.

Authors:  B Leitinger; I I Poletaeva; D P Wolfer; H P Lipp
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.