Literature DB >> 15084747

Human centromere repositioning "in progress".

David J Amor1, Karen Bentley, Jacinta Ryan, Jo Perry, Lee Wong, Howard Slater, K H Andy Choo.   

Abstract

Centromere repositioning provides a potentially powerful evolutionary force for reproductive isolation and speciation, but the underlying mechanisms remain ill-defined. An attractive model is through the simultaneous inactivation of a normal centromere and the formation of a new centromere at a hitherto noncentromeric chromosomal location with minimal detrimental effect. We report a two-generation family in which the centromeric activity of one chromosome 4 has been relocated to a euchromatic site at 4q21.3 through the epigenetic formation of a neocentromere in otherwise cytogenetically normal and mitotically stable karyotypes. Strong epigenetic inactivation of the original centromere is suggested by retention of 1.3 megabases of centromeric alpha-satellite DNA, absence of detectable molecular alteration in chromosome 4-centromereproximal p- and q-arm sequences, and failure of the inactive centromere to be reactivated through extensive culturing or treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. The neocentromere binds functionally essential centromere proteins (CENP-A, CENP-C, CENP-E, CENP-I, BUB1, and HP1), although a moderate reduction in CENP-A binding and sister-chromatid cohesion compared with the typical centromeres suggests possible underlying structural/functional differences. The stable mitotic and meiotic transmissibility of this pseudodicentric-neocentric chromosome in healthy individuals and the ability of the neocentric activity to form in a euchromatic site in preference to a preexisting alphoid domain provide direct evidence for an inherent mechanism of human centromere repositioning and karyotype evolution "in progress." We discuss the wider implication of such a mechanism for meiotic drive and the evolution of primate and other species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15084747      PMCID: PMC404081          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0308637101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

Review 1.  Domain organization at the centromere and neocentromere.

Authors:  K H Choo
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  INCENP loss from an inactive centromere correlates with the loss of sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  P B Vagnarelli; W C Earnshaw
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Co-localization of centromere activity, proteins and topoisomerase II within a subdomain of the major human X alpha-satellite array.

Authors:  Jennifer M Spence; Ricky Critcher; Thomas A Ebersole; Manuel M Valdivia; William C Earnshaw; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Christine J Farr
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  A novel chromatin immunoprecipitation and array (CIA) analysis identifies a 460-kb CENP-A-binding neocentromere DNA.

Authors:  A W Lo; D J Magliano; M C Sibson; P Kalitsis; J M Craig; K H Choo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Transmission of a fully functional human neocentromere through three generations.

Authors:  C Tyler-Smith; G Gimelli; S Giglio; G Floridia; A Pandya; G Terzoli; P E Warburton; W C Earnshaw; O Zuffardi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Comparative mapping of human alphoid sequences in great apes using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  N Archidiacono; R Antonacci; R Marzella; P Finelli; A Lonoce; M Rocchi
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-01-20       Impact factor: 5.736

7.  The activation of a neocentromere in Drosophila requires proximity to an endogenous centromere.

Authors:  K A Maggert; G H Karpen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Human centromeres and neocentromeres show identical distribution patterns of >20 functionally important kinetochore-associated proteins.

Authors:  R Saffery; D V Irvine; B Griffiths; P Kalitsis; L Wordeman; K H Choo
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-01-22       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Genomic microarray analysis reveals distinct locations for the CENP-A binding domains in three human chromosome 13q32 neocentromeres.

Authors:  Alicia Alonso; Radma Mahmood; Shulan Li; Fanny Cheung; Kinya Yoda; Peter E Warburton
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Centromere repositioning.

Authors:  G Montefalcone; S Tempesta; M Rocchi; N Archidiacono
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  98 in total

1.  HJURP uses distinct CENP-A surfaces to recognize and to stabilize CENP-A/histone H4 for centromere assembly.

Authors:  Emily A Bassett; Jamie DeNizio; Meghan C Barnhart-Dailey; Tanya Panchenko; Nikolina Sekulic; Danielle J Rogers; Daniel R Foltz; Ben E Black
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Chromosomal dynamics of human neocentromere formation.

Authors:  Peter E Warburton
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Centromeric DNA sequences in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans are all different and unique.

Authors:  Kaustuv Sanyal; Mary Baum; John Carbon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Active transcription and essential role of RNA polymerase II at the centromere during mitosis.

Authors:  F Lyn Chan; Owen J Marshall; Richard Saffery; Bo Won Kim; Elizabeth Earle; K H Andy Choo; Lee H Wong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Interstitial deletion of proximal 8q including part of the centromere from unbalanced segregation of a paternal deletion/marker karyotype with neocentromere formation at 8p22.

Authors:  R D Burnside; J Ibrahim; C Flora; S Schwartz; J H Tepperberg; P R Papenhausen; P E Warburton
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  Ancestral grass karyotype reconstruction unravels new mechanisms of genome shuffling as a source of plant evolution.

Authors:  Florent Murat; Jian-Hong Xu; Eric Tannier; Michael Abrouk; Nicolas Guilhot; Caroline Pont; Joachim Messing; Jérôme Salse
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of centromeres.

Authors:  Laura S Burrack; Judith Berman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 8.  Two distinct pathways responsible for the loading of CENP-A to centromeres in the fission yeast cell cycle.

Authors:  Kohta Takahashi; Yuko Takayama; Fumie Masuda; Yasuyo Kobayashi; Shigeaki Saitoh
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Ecotype-specific and chromosome-specific expansion of variant centromeric satellites in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Hidetaka Ito; Asuka Miura; Kazuya Takashima; Tetsuji Kakutani
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 10.  The ABCs of CENPs.

Authors:  Marinela Perpelescu; Tatsuo Fukagawa
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.