Literature DB >> 11726424

How does the plethysmogram derived from the pulse oximeter relate to arterial blood pressure in coronary artery bypass graft patients?

A A Awad1, M A Ghobashy, R G Stout, D G Silverman, K H Shelley.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Twenty patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting had their ear and finger oximeter and radial artery blood pressure (Bp(meas)) waveforms collected. The ear and finger pulse oximeter waveforms were analyzed to extract beat-to-beat amplitude and area and width measurements. The Bp(meas) waveforms were analyzed to measured systolic blood pressure (BP), mean BP, and pulse pressure. The correlation coefficient was determined between the derived waveforms from the pulse oximeter and Bp(meas) for the first 10 patients. The ear pulse oximeter width (Width(Ear)) had the best correlation (r = 0.8). Linear regression was done between Width(Ear) and Bp(meas) based on slope (b) and intercept (a) values, BP was calculated (Bp(calc)) in the next 10 patients as: [equation: see text] where i = systolic BP, mean BP, and pulse pressure. The initial bias was too large to be clinically useful. To improve clinical applicability a period of calibration was introduced in which the first 50 readings of Width(Ear) and Bp(meas) for each patient were used to calculate the intercept. After calibration the systolic BP, mean BP and pulse pressure bias values were -2.6, -1.88 and -1.28 mm Hg, and the precision values were 15.9 10.09, and 9.94 mm Hg, respectively. The present attempt to develop a clinically useful method of noninvasive BP measuring was partly successful with the requirement of a calibration period. IMPLICATIONS: Statistical comparison was made between measured blood pressure (BP) from arterial line and calculated BP derived from ear pulse oximeter waveform in 10 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Using 62,077 paired readings, the mean difference for systolic BP, mean BP, and pulse pressure between the 2 methods was -2.6, -1.88, and -1.28 mm Hg, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11726424     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200112000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  11 in total

1.  Impact of central hypovolemia on photoplethysmographic waveform parameters in healthy volunteers. Part 1: time domain analysis.

Authors:  Aymen A Alian; Nicholas J Galante; Nina S Stachenfeld; David G Silverman; Kirk H Shelley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Yong Wang; Yanfei Sun; Gang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Analysis of the ear pulse oximeter waveform.

Authors:  Aymen A Awad; Robert G Stout; M Ashraf M Ghobashy; Hoda A Rezkanna; David G Silverman; Kirk H Shelley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Photoplethysmographic characterization of vascular tone mediated changes in arterial pressure: an observational study.

Authors:  Gerardo Tusman; Cecilia M Acosta; Sven Pulletz; Stephan H Böhm; Adriana Scandurra; Jorge Martinez Arca; Matías Madorno; Fernando Suarez Sipmann
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  A Century of Technology in Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Authors:  Jane S Moon; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients.

Authors:  Marc Feissel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Paolo Merlani; Julio Badie; Jean-Pierre Faller; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The relationship between the photoplethysmographic waveform and systemic vascular resistance.

Authors:  Aymen A Awad; Ala S Haddadin; Hossam Tantawy; Tarek M Badr; Robert G Stout; David G Silverman; Kirk H Shelley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Hosam M Atef; Salah Abd Fattah; Mohammed Emad Abd Gaffer; Ahamed Abd Al Rahman
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03

9.  Age-related and sex-related changes in perfusion index in response to noxious electrical stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Toshiki Nishimura; Aya Nakae; Masahiko Shibata; Takashi Mashimo; Yuji Fujino
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Can Perfusion Index be used as an Objective Tool for Pain Assessment in Labor Analgesia?

Authors:  Ilke Kupeli; Nur Gozde Kulhan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.