Literature DB >> 11726375

A bold new direction for environmental health research.

K Olden1, J Guthrie, S Newton.   

Abstract

The biotechnology revolution has opened new opportunities for addressing current inadequacies in decision making regarding environmental health. Strategic investments need to be made (1) to develop high-throughput technologies that could accelerate toxicity testing and generate a mechanistic understanding of toxicity, (2) to incorporate individual susceptibility into risk assessments, and (3) to establish a rational basis for testing and regulatory decision making. New initiatives of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, including the Environmental Genome Project and the Toxicogenomics Center, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11726375      PMCID: PMC1446914          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

Review 1.  Environmental health and genomics: visions and implications.

Authors:  K Olden; S Wilson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Toxicogenomics. Toxicologists brace for genomics revolution.

Authors:  R A Lovett
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-07-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genomics and human disease--variations on variation.

Authors:  P O Brown; L Hartwell
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  The Environmental Genome Project.

Authors:  S L Shalat; J Y Hong; M Gallo
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Environment institute lays plans for gene hunt.

Authors:  J Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland.

Authors:  P Lichtenstein; N V Holm; P K Verkasalo; A Iliadou; J Kaprio; M Koskenvuo; E Pukkala; A Skytthe; K Hemminki
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  The Environmental Genome Project: functional analysis of polymorphisms.

Authors:  F P Guengerich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?

Authors:  L W Green; S L Mercer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Gene-environment interactions in the development of complex disease phenotypes.

Authors:  Rosemarie G Ramos; Kenneth Olden
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Trust, benefit, satisfaction, and burden: a randomized controlled trial to reduce cancer risk through African-American churches.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Alice S Ammerman; Mira L Katz; Diane Marie M St George; Connie Blumenthal; Chanetta Washington; Benita Weathers; Thomas C Keyserling; Boyd Switzer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Community-based participatory research: a vehicle to promote public engagement for environmental health in China.

Authors:  Robbie Ali; Kenneth Olden; Shunqing Xu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Drivers of and Obstacles to the Adoption of Toxicogenomics for Chemical Risk Assessment: Insights from Social Science Perspectives.

Authors:  Guillaume Pain; Gordon Hickey; Matthieu Mondou; Doug Crump; Markus Hecker; Niladri Basu; Steven Maguire
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.