Literature DB >> 11721632

Laser capture microdissection and proteomics: possibilities and limitation.

R A Craven1, R E Banks.   

Abstract

Tissue heterogeneity has always limited the information available from analysis of biological samples in the study of disease. Several approaches have been developed to address this problem, with laser capture microdissection (LCM) emerging as one of the methods of choice. LCM has been extensively used in combination with mutation detection studies and analyses of gene expression at the mRNA level and its potential in proteomics-based research is beginning to be realised. Here we review the progress made to date in the analysis of proteins in LCM-captured material and evaluate the scope and limitations of this approach.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11721632     DOI: 10.1002/1615-9861(200110)1:10<1200::AID-PROT1200>3.0.CO;2-Q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  20 in total

Review 1.  Tissue and cell imaging in situ: potential for applications in pathology and endoscopy.

Authors:  J-Y Scoazec
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Laser capture sampling and analytical issues in proteomics.

Authors:  Howard B Gutstein; Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Lack of compatibility of histological staining methods with proteomic analysis of laser-capture microdissected brain samples.

Authors:  Lionel Mouledous; Sybille Hunt; Rebecca Harcourt; Jenny L Harry; Keith L Williams; Howard B Gutstein
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2002-12

4.  Laser capture microdissection in the genomic and proteomic era: targeting the genetic basis of cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Domazet; Gregory T Maclennan; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Rodolfo Montironi; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2008-03-15

5.  Effect of immunohistochemistry on molecular analysis of tissue samples: implications for microdissection technologies.

Authors:  Michael A Tangrea; Sumana Mukherjee; Bing Gao; Sanford P Markey; Qiang Du; Michael Armani; Matthew S Kreitman; Alex M Rosenberg; Benjamin S Wallis; Franziska C Eberle; Francesca C Duncan; Jeffrey C Hanson; Rodrigo F Chuaqui; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Michael R Emmert-Buck
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Enrichment of single neurons and defined brain regions from human brain tissue samples for subsequent proteome analysis.

Authors:  Mariana Molina; Simone Steinbach; Young Mok Park; Su Yeong Yun; Ana Tereza Di Lorenzo Alho; Helmut Heinsen; Lea T Grinberg; Katrin Marcus; Renata E Paraizo Leite; Caroline May
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Novel translational strategies in colorectal cancer research.

Authors:  Ignacio Gil-Bazo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Enhanced interferon signaling pathway in oral cancer revealed by quantitative proteome analysis of microdissected specimens using 16O/18O labeling and integrated two-dimensional LC-ESI-MALDI tandem MS.

Authors:  Lang-Ming Chi; Chien-Wei Lee; Kai-Ping Chang; Sheng-Po Hao; Hang-Mao Lee; Ying Liang; Chuen Hsueh; Chia-Jung Yu; I-Neng Lee; Yin-Ju Chang; Shih-Ying Lee; Yuan-Ming Yeh; Yu-Sun Chang; Kun-Yi Chien; Jau-Song Yu
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Inferring predominant pathways in cellular models of breast cancer using limited sample proteomic profiling.

Authors:  Yogesh M Kulkarni; Vivian Suarez; David J Klinke
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Identification of crystallin modifications in the human lens cortex and nucleus using laser capture microdissection and CyDye labeling.

Authors:  C O Asomugha; R Gupta; O P Srivastava
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.