Literature DB >> 11719669

Focal nodular hyperplasia: morphologic and functional information from MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine.

L Grazioli1, G Morana, M P Federle, G Brancatelli, M Testoni, M A Kirchin, K Menni, L Olivetti, N Nicoli, C Procacci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) is able to provide morphologic and functional information for characterization of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients with proved FNH were retrospectively examined. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences was performed. Images were acquired prior to and during the dynamic phase of contrast-material enhancement and 1-3 hours after administration of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA. Qualitative analysis of signal intensity and homogeneity on images in the various phases of the MR study and examination for the presence of central scar or atypical features were performed. On the basis of features observed in the precontrast and dynamic phases, lesions were defined as typical or atypical. Intensity and enhancement patterns of the lesions and scars were also evaluated in the delayed phase.
RESULTS: One hundred FNHs were depicted on MR images. Seventy-nine of 100 lesions demonstrated typical morphologic and enhancement characteristics. On delayed phase images, 72% of 100 FNHs appeared hyperintense; 21%, isointense; and 7%, slightly hypointense. The delayed pattern of enhancement was homogeneous, heterogeneous, and peripheral in 58%, 22%, and 20% of 100 FNHs, respectively. Atypical morphologic features and lesion and/or scar enhancement were observed in 21 of 100 FNHs. On delayed phase images, 76% of 100 atypical FNHs appeared hyperintense, 14% isointense, and 10% slightly hypointense. Hyperintensity and isointensity allowed the correct characterization in 90% of atypical FNHs.
CONCLUSION: Gd-BOPTA during both dynamic and delayed phases provides morphologic and functional information for the characterization of FNH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11719669     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2213010139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  33 in total

Review 1.  Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: current diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Agustin Cristiano; Agustin Dietrich; Juan Carlos Spina; Victoria Ardiles; Eduardo de Santibañes
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06-27

2.  Malignant focal liver lesions at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance with hepatospecific contrast agent.

Authors:  M D'Onofrio; S Crosara; R De Robertis; S Canestrini; V Cantisani; G Morana; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Ring-like enhancement of focal nodular hyperplasia with hepatobiliary-phase Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: radiological-pathological correlation.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Shigeki Sekine; Hiroaki Onaya; Kazuaki Shimada; Rintaro Mikata; Yasuaki Arai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Use of accumulation images obtained by arterial-phase contrast-enhanced harmonic grayscale ultrasonography to evaluate tumor vessels in focal nodular hyperplasia and other hepatic tumors.

Authors:  Kazushi Numata; Manabu Morimoto; Tetsuo Isozaki; Kazuya Sugimori; Hiroyuki Oka; Kenichi Matsuo; Hiroshi Shimada; Toshio Imada; Katsuaki Tanaka
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 5.  Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from its various mimickers in liver magnetic resonance imaging: What are the tips when using hepatocyte-specific agents?

Authors:  Yang Shin Park; Chang Hee Lee; Jeong Woo Kim; Sora Shin; Cheol Min Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenomas with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS): effect of size on diagnostic confidence.

Authors:  Vincent Roche; Frederic Pigneur; Lambros Tselikas; Marion Roux; Laurence Baranes; Marjane Djabbari; Charlotte Costentin; Julien Calderaro; Alexis Laurent; Alain Rahmouni; Alain Luciani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of the diagnostic strategies for differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma.

Authors:  Chong Hyun Suh; Kyung Won Kim; Seong Ho Park; Sangjin Shin; Jeonghoon Ahn; Junhee Pyo; Atul B Shinagare; Katherine M Krajewski; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Clinical value of MRI liver-specific contrast agents: a tailored examination for a confident non-invasive diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Martin Uffmann; Sanjai Saini; Nina Bastati; Christian Herold; Wolfgang Schima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Contrast agents for hepatic MRI.

Authors:  Giovanni Morana; Elisabetta Salviato; Alessandro Guarise
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Distinguishing benign from malignant liver tumours.

Authors:  Jay P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.