Literature DB >> 17921081

Contrast agents for hepatic MRI.

Giovanni Morana1, Elisabetta Salviato, Alessandro Guarise.   

Abstract

Liver specific contrast media (LSCM) can be subdivided according to different modalities of hepatic distribution: exclusive distribution to the hepatocellular compartment can be obtained using CM which accumulate within the hepatocytes after slow infusion; other CM demonstrate combined perfusion and hepatocyte-selective properties, with an initial distribution to the vascular-interstitial compartment (in an analogous manner to that of the conventional extracellular CM), thereafter, a fraction of the injected dose is taken up into the hepatocytes causing an increase in the signal intensity of the hepatic tissue. The use of the superparamagnetic effect of iron oxide particles is based on distribution in the reticuloendothelial system (RES), usually well represented in the normal parenchyma as well as in benign hepatocellular lesions, and absent in most malignant lesions. It is necessary to have an in-depth knowledge of either the biological and histological characteristics of focal liver lesions (FLL) or the enhancement mechanism of LSCM to gain significant accuracy in the differential diagnosis of FLL. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is an important tool in the identification and characterization of FLL. With LSCM it is possible to differentiate benign from malignant lesions and hepatocellular lesions from non hepatocellular lesions with high accuracy. To understand the contrast behaviour after injection of LSCM it is necessary to correlate the contrast enhancement with both the biological and histological findings of FLL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17921081      PMCID: PMC2727962          DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2007.9001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Imaging        ISSN: 1470-7330            Impact factor:   3.909


  37 in total

1.  Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T.

Authors:  R C Semelka; J P Shoenut; M A Kroeker; H M Greenberg; F C Simm; G Y Minuk; R M Kroeker; A B Micflikier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.

Authors:  T J Vogl; S Kümmel; R Hammerstingl; M Schellenbeck; G Schumacher; T Balzer; W Schwarz; P K Müller; W O Bechstein; M G Mack; O Söllner; R Felix
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and pancreas.

Authors:  C Wang
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1998

4.  Focal malignant hepatic lesions: MR imaging enhanced with gadolinium benzyloxypropionictetra-acetate (BOPTA)--preliminary results of phase II clinical application.

Authors:  R Caudana; G Morana; G P Pirovano; N Nicoli; A Portuese; A Spinazzi; R Di Rito; G F Pistolesi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Differentiation of hepatomas from nonhepatomatous masses: use of MnDPDP-enhanced MR images.

Authors:  J Liou; J K Lee; J A Borrello; J J Brown
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging.

Authors:  B Hamm; T Staks; A Mühler; M Bollow; M Taupitz; T Frenzel; K J Wolf; H J Weinmann; L Lange
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Hepatocellular tumors: characterization with Mn-DPDP-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  N M Rofsky; J C Weinreb; M E Bernardino; S W Young; J K Lee; M E Noz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: a multicenter clinical trial of the safety and efficacy in the detection of focal hepatic lesions.

Authors:  P R Ros; P C Freeny; S E Harms; S E Seltzer; P L Davis; T W Chan; A E Stillman; L R Muroff; V M Runge; M A Nissenbaum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Focal liver lesions: characterization with nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  B Hamm; R F Thoeni; R G Gould; M E Bernardino; M Lüning; S Saini; A E Mahfouz; M Taupitz; K J Wolf
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Biliary excretion and pharmacokinetics of a gadolinium chelate used as a liver-specific contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging in the rat.

Authors:  G Schuhmann-Giampieri; H Schmitt-Willich; T Frenzel; H ] Schitt-Willich H [corrected to Schmitt-Willich
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.534

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Insight into hepatocellular carcinoma biology with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Alexander Kagen; Kathryn Fowler; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 2.  In vivo bio-imaging using chlorotoxin-based conjugates.

Authors:  Mark R Stroud; Stacey J Hansen; James M Olson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: New imaging strategies for evaluating focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Kenneth Coenegrachts
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

Review 4.  Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Theranostic Agents in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Rossella Canese; Federica Vurro; Pasquina Marzola
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 5.  Clinical value of MRI liver-specific contrast agents: a tailored examination for a confident non-invasive diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Martin Uffmann; Sanjai Saini; Nina Bastati; Christian Herold; Wolfgang Schima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Age dependence of spleen- and muscle-corrected hepatic signal enhancement on hepatobiliary phase gadoxetate MRI.

Authors:  Simon Matoori; Johannes M Froehlich; Stefan Breitenstein; Aleksis Doert; Viktoria Pozdniakova; Dow-Mu Koh; Andreas Gutzeit
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  An in vivo transmission electron microscopy study of injected dextran-coated iron-oxide nanoparticle location in murine breast adenocarcinoma tumors versus time.

Authors:  A J Giustini; R Ivkov; P J Hoopes
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2009-02-12

8.  Inter-observer agreement on the assessment of relative liver lesion signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase imaging with gadoxetate (Gd-EOB-DTPA).

Authors:  Sharon Ngu; Lizza Lebron-Zapata; Christy Pomeranz; Seth Katz; Scott Gerst; Junting Zheng; Chaya Moskowitz; Richard K G Do
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-01

9.  Magnetic nanoparticles as targeted delivery systems in oncology.

Authors:  Sara Prijic; Gregor Sersa
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 10.  Nanoparticles for imaging: top or flop?

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Marianne E Mertens; Jan Grimm; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.