Literature DB >> 11717093

Detection of porcine bone lesions and fissures: comparing digital selenium, digital luminescence, and analog film-screen radiography.

M Zähringer1, B Krug, K F Kamm, G Wassmer, M Hellmich, G Winnekendonk, J Andermahr, A Gossmann, K J Lackner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a digital selenium detector (Thoravision) with that of analog film-screen systems and digital luminescence radiography in skeletal radiography for the detection of fissures and lesions in porcine bones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred bones taken from domestic pigs (50 ribs and 50 femurs) were divided into two equal groups. Fissures and bone lesions were created in 50 bones and 50 served as controls. The bones were examined using film-screen systems, digital luminescence radiography, and digital selenium radiography at various doses. Digital selenium radiography exposure values were adapted to the image geometry differing from the reference methods with a detector focus distance of 2.15 m. Four radiologists independently evaluated image quality and detectability of fissures and lesions on a five-point scale of confidence. Statistical evaluation was based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: Fissures and bone lesions were detected most reliably using the mammography film-screen system, but the difference in the results of the analog and digital reference images did not achieve statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: Compared with analog film-screen systems, the lower spatial resolution of the digital selenium and digital luminescence radiography systems does not affect detectability of fissures and bone lesions in porcine bone. Selenium is effective in skeletal radiography for detecting fissures and bone lesions. With digital selenium and digital luminescence radiography, the surface dose can be cut to half that required for 200-speed film-screen systems without losing any diagnostically relevant information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11717093     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.6.1771397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  3 in total

1.  Are digital images good enough? A comparative study of conventional film-screen vs digital radiographs on printed images of total hip replacement.

Authors:  K Eklund; K Jonsson; G Lindblom; B Lundin; J Sanfridsson; M Sloth; B Sivberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Slot-scan digital radiography of the lower extremities: a comparison to computed radiography with respect to image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Kwang Hwi Lee; Jong Won Kwon; Young Cheol Yoon; Sang Hee Choi; Jee Young Jung; Ji Hye Kim; Sang Jun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Transgenic mice over-expressing carbonic anhydrase I showed aggravated joint inflammation and tissue destruction.

Authors:  Yabing Zheng; Lin Wang; Wei Zhang; Hengwei Xu; Xiaotian Chang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.