Literature DB >> 11716390

Mobility and contact mechanics of a rotating platform total knee replacement.

J K Otto1, J J Callaghan, T D Brown.   

Abstract

Despite their increasing clinical use, mobile-bearing total knee replacements have not been well characterized biomechanically. An experimental and finite element analysis was done to assess the mobility and contact mechanics of a widely used rotating platform total knee replacement. Parameters that varied were axial load, condylar load allocation, flexion angle, and static versus dynamic loading. Similar results from the physical model and finite element model lend credence to the validity of the findings. The torque required to initiate rotation (static torque) was greater than that to sustain rotation (dynamic torque). At four times body weight axial load, peak resisting torque measured was 9.47+/-0.61 and 5.51+/-0.38 N-m, for static and dynamic torque, respectively. A 60-40 condylar load allocation produced slightly less resisting torque than the 50-50 load. For all practical purposes, the polyethylene insert rotated simultaneously with the femoral component, leading to maintenance of high contact area, desirable behavior clinically. Walking cycle simulations produced a total axial rotation range of motion of 6 degrees. The high frictional torques observed at the mobile interface may explain why a percentage of these mobile-bearings fail to rotate under routine functional load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716390     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Preferential superior surface motion in wear simulations of the Charité total disc replacement.

Authors:  Curtis M Goreham-Voss; Rachel Vicars; Richard M Hall; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Implant wear and aseptic loosening. An overview].

Authors:  C Kaddick; I Catelas; P H Pennekamp; M A Wimmer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Comparison among total knee arthroplasties with a mobile bearing: menisci versus rotating platform versus AP glide platform.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Andrea Luca; Luigi Marzo; Lorenzo Scialpi; Giovanni B Solarino
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-06-27

Review 4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Farshid Ejtehadi; Rachel Nichols; Leigh Davies; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Long-term outcome of low contact stress total knee arthroplasty with different mobile bearing designs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Antonio Spinarelli; Massimiliano Carrozzo; Andrea Piazzolla; Giovanni Vicenti; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

6.  Cross-shear implementation in sliding-distance-coupled finite element analysis of wear in metal-on-polyethylene total joint arthroplasty: intervertebral total disc replacement as an illustrative application.

Authors:  Curtis M Goreham-Voss; Philip J Hyde; Richard M Hall; John Fisher; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Recent advances in computational mechanics of the human knee joint.

Authors:  M Kazemi; Y Dabiri; L P Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  MOBILE TIBIAL POLYETHYLENE BEARING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros Cobra; Idemar Monteiro da Palma
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.