Literature DB >> 11716185

Pregnancy and lactation confer reversible bone loss in humans.

C Karlsson1, K J Obrant, M Karlsson.   

Abstract

The influence of pregnancy on bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 73 women (mean age 29 years, range 20-44 years) postpartum. Fifty-five age-matched women served as controls. The influence of lactation was evaluated in 65 of the delivered women who were followed with repeated measurements, a mean of 4.5 +/- 0.1 and 11.5 +/- 0.1 months after the delivery. The influence of multiple pregnancies was evaluated in 39 premenopausal women (mean age 38 years, range 31-54 years) with a minimum of four pregnancies (range 4-7). Fifty-eight age-matched healthy premenopausal women with a maximum of two pregnancies (range 0-2) served as controls. Data are presented as mean +/- SEM. BMD data are adjusted for differences in total fat mass and total lean mass. Lumbar spine BMD was 7.6 +/- 0.1% and total body BMD 3.9 +/- 0.1% lower in women postpartum compared with controls (both p<0.001). BMD did not decrease significantly in non-breastfeeding mothers. Mothers breastfeeding for 1-6 months decreased femoral neck BMD by 2.0 +/- 1.0% during the first 5 months postpartum (p<0.001). No further BMD loss was seen between 5 and 12 months postpartum. Femoral neck BMD 12 months after delivery was 1.3 +/- 0.8% lower than after delivery in mothers breastfeeding for 1-6 months (p = 0.05). Mothers breastfeeding for more than 6 months decreased Ward's triangle BMD by 8.5 +/- 1.0% and lumbar spine BMD by 4.1 +/- 0.8% during the first 5 months postpartum (both p<0.05). No further BMD loss was seen between 5 and 12 months postpartum. Femoral neck BMD 12 months after delivery was 4.0 +/- 1.1% lower and Ward's triangle BMD 5.3 +/- 1.9% lower than after delivery in mothers breastfeeding for more than 6 months (both p<0.05). BMD loss was higher during the first 5 months following delivery in the lactating women compared with the non-lactating women (p<0.05 comparing lumbar spine BMD loss in lactating mothers versus non-lactating mothers). However, in women with a minimum of four pregnancies the BMD was no lower than in age-matched women with fewer pregnancies. Total duration of lactation was not correlated with the present BMD. In summary, pregnancy seem to confer a low BMD with additional BMD loss during 5 months of lactation. Even if complete restoration in BMD was not reached within 5 months of weaning, women with four pregnancies or more had a BMD no lower than women with two pregnancies or fewer. We conclude that neither an extended lactation period nor multiple pregnancies could be used as a risk factor when predicting women at risk for future osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716185     DOI: 10.1007/s001980170033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  59 in total

1.  Parity and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Kauppi; M Heliövaara; O Impivaara; P Knekt; A Jula
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone status after pregnancy and during lactation.

Authors:  W Pluskiewicz; B Drozdzowska
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Nutritional requirements during lactation. Towards European alignment of reference values: the EURRECA network.

Authors:  Victoria Hall Moran; Nicola Lowe; Nicola Crossland; Cristiana Berti; Irene Cetin; Maria Hermoso; Berthold Koletzko; Fiona Dykes
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Quantitative ultrasound in relation to risk factors for low bone mineral density in South African pre-menopausal women.

Authors:  Deborah Constant; Lynn Rosenberg; Yuqing Zhang; Diane Cooper; Asgar A Kalla; Lisa Micklesfield; Margaret Hoffman
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Vitamin D receptor genotype and risk of osteoporotic hip fracture in elderly women of Utah: an effect modified by parity.

Authors:  H Wengreen; D R Cutler; R Munger; M Willing
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone mineral density in Norwegian premenopausal women.

Authors:  Elin Kolle; Monica Klungland Torstveit; Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Effects of pregnancy and lactation on bone mineral density, and their relation to the serum calcium, phosphorus, calcitonin and parathyroid hormone levels in rats.

Authors:  E Gonen; I Sahin; M Ozbek; E Kovalak; S Yologlu; Y Ates
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Effect of parity on phalangeal bone mineral density in post-menopausal Sri Lankan women: a community based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sarath Lekamwasam; Lalith Wijayaratne; Mahinda Rodrigo; Udul Hewage
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Recent experimental and clinical findings in the skeleton associated with loss of estrogen hormone or estrogen receptor activity.

Authors:  Eric P Smith; Bonny Specker; Kenneth S Korach
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.292

10.  Expression of prolactin receptors in the duodenum, kidneys and skeletal system during physiological and sulpiride-induced hyperprolactinaemia.

Authors:  Danijela Radojkovic; Milica Pesic; Milan Radojkovic; Dragan Dimic; Marija Vukelic Nikolic; Tatjana Jevtovic Stoimenov; Sasa Radenkovic; Milena Velojic Golubovic; Tatjana Radjenovic Petkovic; Slobodan Antic
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.