Literature DB >> 11715007

Insurance reimbursement for risk-reducing mastectomy and oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

N D Kauff1, L Scheuer, M E Robson, E Glogowski, B Kelly, R Barakat, A Heerdt, P I Borgen, J G Davis, K Offit.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Risk-reducing surgery is an important option for women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. There are reports in the literature that insurance reimbursement for these procedures varies greatly. Because health insurance coverage significantly affects medical decision-making, current information regarding reimbursement practices of third-party payers is needed.
METHODS: Retrospective study of hospital billing records of 38 women with documented BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who underwent either a risk-reducing mastectomy or a risk-reducing oophorectomy between March 1, 1997, and July 30, 2000.
RESULTS: Complete billing and reimbursement information was available for 35 women undergoing a total of 39 risk-reducing surgeries. A total of 38 of 39 (97%) risk-reducing surgeries were covered in full, less applicable coinsurance and deductibles. The rate of insurance reimbursement did not vary with type of insurance, personal history of cancer, or type of procedure.
CONCLUSION: Insurance carriers reimbursed the vast majority of BRCA mutation carriers undergoing risk-reducing surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11715007     DOI: 10.1097/00125817-200111000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  6 in total

1.  Uptake, time course, and predictors of risk-reducing surgeries in BRCA carriers.

Authors:  Mary S Beattie; Beth Crawford; Feng Lin; Eric Vittinghoff; John Ziegler
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-02

Review 2.  Cancer in Jews: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Gershon Y Locker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Mentoring nurses in familial cancer risk assessment and counseling: lessons learned from a formative evaluation.

Authors:  Agnes Masny; Mary E Ropka; Candace Peterson; Dominique Fetzer; Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: comparing breast and ovarian cancers with colon cancers.

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; Christopher DeRienzo; Julia Carbone; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Christopher Heaney; Christopher Conover
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Germline BRCA2 mutations detected in pediatric sequencing studies impact parents' evaluation and care.

Authors:  Michael F Walsh; Jennifer Kennedy; Megan Harlan; Alex Kentsis; Neerav Shukla; Jacob Musinsky; Stephen Roberts; Andrew L Kung; Mark Robson; Brian H Kushner; Paul Meyers; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2017-11-21

6.  Different Patterns of Risk Reducing Decisions in Affected or Unaffected BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers.

Authors:  Eun-Gyeong Lee; Hyok Jo Kang; Myong Cheol Lim; Boyoung Park; Soo Jin Park; So-Youn Jung; Seeyoun Lee; Han-Sung Kang; Sang-Yoon Park; Boram Park; Jungnam Joo; Jai Hong Han; Sun-Young Kong; Eun Sook Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.679

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.