Literature DB >> 11713286

Antisense transcription through the Xist locus mediates Tsix function in embryonic stem cells.

S Luikenhuis1, A Wutz, R Jaenisch.   

Abstract

Expression of the Xist gene, a key player in mammalian X inactivation, has been proposed to be controlled by the antisense Tsix transcript. Targeted deletion of the Tsix promoter encompassing the DPXas34 locus leads to nonrandom inactivation of the mutant X, but it remains unresolved whether this phenotype is caused by loss of Tsix transcription or by deletion of a crucial DNA element. In this study we determined the role of Tsix transcription in random X inactivation by using mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells as a model system. Two approaches were chosen to modulate Tsix transcription with minimal disturbance of genomic sequences. First, Tsix transcription was functionally inhibited by introducing a transcriptional stop signal into the transcribed region of Tsix. In the second approach, an inducible system for Tsix expression was created. We found that the truncation of the Tsix transcript led to complete nonrandom inactivation of the targeted X chromosome. Induction of Tsix transcription during ES cell differentiation, on the other hand, caused the targeted chromosome always to be chosen as the active chromosome. These results for the first time establish a function for antisense transcription in the regulation of X inactivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11713286      PMCID: PMC100014          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.24.8512-8520.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  45 in total

1.  Targeted mutagenesis of Tsix leads to nonrandom X inactivation.

Authors:  J T Lee; N Lu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Molecular cloning of antisense transcripts of the mouse Xist gene.

Authors:  N Mise; Y Goto; N Nakajima; N Takagi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1999-05-19       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  The search for the mouse X-chromosome inactivation centre.

Authors:  S Rastan; S D Brown
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1990 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Igf2 imprinting does not require its own DNA methylation or H19 RNA.

Authors:  B K Jones; J M Levorse; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain.

Authors:  P Soriano
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Genetic analysis of the mouse X inactivation center defines an 80-kb multifunction domain.

Authors:  J T Lee; N Lu; Y Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Enhancer competition between H19 and Igf2 does not mediate their imprinting.

Authors:  J V Schmidt; J M Levorse; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Tsix, a gene antisense to Xist at the X-inactivation centre.

Authors:  J T Lee; L S Davidow; D Warshawsky
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A DNA cassette containing a trimerized SV40 polyadenylation signal which efficiently blocks spurious plasmid-initiated transcription.

Authors:  I H Maxwell; G S Harrison; W M Wood; F Maxwell
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.993

10.  Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.).

Authors:  M F LYON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1961-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  81 in total

1.  The region 3' to Xist mediates X chromosome counting and H3 Lys-4 dimethylation within the Xist gene.

Authors:  Céline Morey; Pablo Navarro; Emmanuel Debrand; Philip Avner; Claire Rougeulle; Philippe Clerc
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Gene silencing-based disease resistance.

Authors:  Michael Wassenegger
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  The X as model for RNA's niche in epigenomic regulation.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Identification of developmentally specific enhancers for Tsix in the regulation of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Nicholas Stavropoulos; Rebecca K Rowntree; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Dosage compensation, the origin and the afterlife of sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Jan Larsson; Victoria H Meller
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  An essential role for the DXPas34 tandem repeat and Tsix transcription in the counting process of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Sébastien Vigneau; Sandrine Augui; Pablo Navarro; Philip Avner; Philippe Clerc
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Tsix-mediated epigenetic switch of a CTCF-flanked region of the Xist promoter determines the Xist transcription program.

Authors:  Pablo Navarro; Damian R Page; Philip Avner; Claire Rougeulle
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Tsix transcription across the Xist gene alters chromatin conformation without affecting Xist transcription: implications for X-chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Pablo Navarro; Sylvain Pichard; Constance Ciaudo; Philip Avner; Claire Rougeulle
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Functional intergenic transcription: a case study of the X-inactivation centre.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.