Literature DB >> 11713071

Correlation between pupillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive multifocal lens and a monofocal lens.

K Hayashi1, H Hayashi, F Nakao, F Hayashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To see whether there is a correlation between pupillary area or intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt and the visual acuity (VA) at all distances for eyes with a zonal-progressive multifocal IOL or a monofocal IOL.
DESIGN: Comparative, nonrandomized, interventional study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five eyes of 55 patients undergoing five-zone refractive multifocal IOL implantation and 55 eyes of 55 age-matched patients undergoing monofocal IOL implantation. INTERVENTION: All eyes underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The VAs from far to near distances were examined using an all-distance vision tester at 1 month after surgery. The pupillary area was also measured using an infrared pupillometer, and the degrees of IOL decentration and tilt were measured using a Scheimpflug videophotography system. Univariate associations between VA and the pupillary area and IOL decentration or tilt were evaluated statistically.
RESULTS: The mean intermediate VAs and contrast sensitivities at all spatial frequencies in the multifocal IOL group were worse than those in the monofocal IOL group, whereas near VA was better in the multifocal group. In the multifocal group, smaller pupillary area was associated significantly with worse near logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) VA (r = 0.636), but not with far or intermediate VAs. When pupil diameter was 4.5 mm or greater, near mean VA reached 20/63. A greater degree of IOL decentration was associated significantly with worse far and intermediate LogMAR VAs (r = 0.460 at 5.0 m and 0.527 at 1.0 m) but not with near VA. When decentration was 0.9 mm or greater, distance mean VA did not reach 20/32. However, the correlation between tilt and VA was not statistically significant. In the monofocal group, no significant correlation was found between pupillary area, IOL decentration, or tilt and the VA.
CONCLUSIONS: Smaller pupil size is correlated significantly with worse near VA, whereas greater decentration is correlated with worse distance and intermediate VA in eyes with refractive multifocal IOLs. Specifically, a pupil diameter of less than 4.5 mm cannot provide useful near VA, and decentration of 0.9 mm is the maximum allowable limit for adequate distance VA. However, pupil size and IOL decentration do not influence VA in eyes with monofocal IOLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11713071     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00756-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  19 in total

1.  Visual simulation of retinal images through a decentered monofocal and a refractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Kazuno Negishi; Kazuhiko Ohnuma; Takashi Ikeda; Toru Noda
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  [Apodized diffractive optic. New concept in multifocal lens technology].

Authors:  T Kohnen; V Derhartunian
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Light-adjustable lens: customizing correction for multifocality and higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  Christian A Sandstedt; Shiao H Chang; Robert H Grubbs; Daniel M Schwartz
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

4.  All-distance visual acuity in eyes with a nontinted or a yellow-tinted diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Miki Masumoto; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  [Presbyopia correction using intraocular lenses].

Authors:  M P Holzer; T M Rabsilber; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Light-adjustable lens.

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003

Review 7.  [Design and optical principles of multifocal lenses].

Authors:  G U Auffarth; T M Rabsilber; T Kohnen; M P Holzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Maria A Woodward; J Bradley Randleman; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Bilateral Implantation of a New Refractive Multi-Segmented Multifocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract or Refractive Lens Exchange Patients.

Authors:  Mike P Holzer; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Soraya M R Jonker; Erik L J G Mertens; Asim Bozkurt Sener; Jorge A O Cazal; Antoni Salvador Playa; Ramon Ruiz Mesa; Bettina C Thomas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  Medium-term visual outcomes of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with +3.00 d addition power.

Authors:  Xiaohong Guo; Yi Sun; Bowen Zhang; Danying Zheng
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.