OBJECTIVE: To provide data on (a) the probability of detecting antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in a large and consecutive cohort of serum samples referred for ANA testing and (b) the probability of detecting more specific antinuclear reactivities (anti-DNA and anti-extractable nuclear antigens (anti-ENA)) in serum samples with a positive screening test (indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells). METHODS: Serum samples from 10 550 consecutive patients sent to the laboratory for ANA detection were analysed. In ANA positive serum samples (23.5% of referred serum samples), ANA were identified by indirect immunofluorescence on Crithidia, by immunodiffusion, and by line immunoassay. Because anti-SSA antibodies were the most frequently identified ANA, sensitively detected by line immunoassay, additional immunoassays were developed to confirm the specificity of the line immunoassay result. RESULTS: At least one fine reactivity could be identified in 21.1% of ANA positive serum samples: anti-dsDNA in 3.2%; anti-ENA (anti-SSA 10.5%, anti-SSB 6.7%, anti-RNP 2.7%, anti-Sm 1.8%, anti-Scl70 1.2%, anti-Jo-1 0.2%) in 15.8%, rRNP and anti-Cenp-B in respectively 0.5% and 4.0%. Multiple reactivities were found in 7.9%. For anti-ENA antibodies, line immunoassay was more sensitive than immunodiffusion (15.4% v 7.7%; p<0.0001). The sensitive detection of anti-SSA antibodies by line immunoassay was confirmed by additional assays. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this analysis are useful in estimating the probabilities of detecting specific ANA. Line immunoassay was shown to be a sensitive test for the detection of anti-ENA antibodies.
OBJECTIVE: To provide data on (a) the probability of detecting antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in a large and consecutive cohort of serum samples referred for ANA testing and (b) the probability of detecting more specific antinuclear reactivities (anti-DNA and anti-extractable nuclear antigens (anti-ENA)) in serum samples with a positive screening test (indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells). METHODS: Serum samples from 10 550 consecutive patients sent to the laboratory for ANA detection were analysed. In ANA positive serum samples (23.5% of referred serum samples), ANA were identified by indirect immunofluorescence on Crithidia, by immunodiffusion, and by line immunoassay. Because anti-SSA antibodies were the most frequently identified ANA, sensitively detected by line immunoassay, additional immunoassays were developed to confirm the specificity of the line immunoassay result. RESULTS: At least one fine reactivity could be identified in 21.1% of ANA positive serum samples: anti-dsDNA in 3.2%; anti-ENA (anti-SSA 10.5%, anti-SSB 6.7%, anti-RNP 2.7%, anti-Sm 1.8%, anti-Scl70 1.2%, anti-Jo-1 0.2%) in 15.8%, rRNP and anti-Cenp-B in respectively 0.5% and 4.0%. Multiple reactivities were found in 7.9%. For anti-ENA antibodies, line immunoassay was more sensitive than immunodiffusion (15.4% v 7.7%; p<0.0001). The sensitive detection of anti-SSA antibodies by line immunoassay was confirmed by additional assays. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this analysis are useful in estimating the probabilities of detecting specific ANA. Line immunoassay was shown to be a sensitive test for the detection of anti-ENA antibodies.
Authors: E M Tan; J S Smolen; J S McDougal; B T Butcher; D Conn; R Dawkins; M J Fritzler; T Gordon; J A Hardin; J R Kalden; R G Lahita; R N Maini; N F Rothfield; R Smeenk; Y Takasaki; W J van Venrooij; A Wiik; M Wilson; J A Koziol Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1999-03
Authors: L Meheus; W J van Venrooij; A Wiik; P J Charles; A G Tzioufas; O Meyer; G Steiner; D Gianola; S Bombardieri; A Union; S De Keyser; E Veys; F De Keyser Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 1999 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: Ada Man; Kam Shojania; Carmen Phoon; Jason Pal; Monika Hudoba de Badyn; David Pi; Diane Lacaille Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2013-01-06 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Karl Egerer; Dirk Roggenbuck; Rico Hiemann; Max-Georg Weyer; Thomas Büttner; Boris Radau; Rosemarie Krause; Barbara Lehmann; Eugen Feist; Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 5.156