Literature DB >> 15801070

Utility of age, gender, ANA titer and pattern as predictors of anti-ENA and -dsDNA antibodies.

Insoo Kang1, Robyn Siperstein, Tim Quan, Mary Lou Breitenstein.   

Abstract

Monovariate and multivariate analyses including logistic regression were performed to determine associations among predicting variables [age, gender, immunofluorescence pattern, and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titer] and anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) and -dsDNA antibodies (Abs) in 1089 patients with positive fluorescent ANA (FANA) test results. Samples with high titer ANAs had an increased frequency of anti-ENA and -dsDNA Abs. The receiver operating (ROC) curves of the ANA titer for anti-ENA Abs had a larger under the curve area compared to the ROC curve for anti-dsDNA Abs, indicating that ANA titer is better for predicting anti-ENA Abs than anti-dsDNA Abs. There was no relation noticed between immunofluorescence patterns and anti-ENA and -dsDNA Abs except an increased frequency of anti-dsDNA Abs found in samples with a homogeneous pattern. Probability calculations on the basis of the ANA pattern and the titer showed that samples with low titer ANAs (1:160 or less) had low probabilities for anti-ENA Abs (0.002-0.009) regardless of immunofluorescence patterns. However, samples with a homogeneous pattern at any titers including low titers had high probabilities for anti-dsDNA Abs. A decreased frequency of anti-dsDNA Abs as measured by Crithidia assay was noticed in samples from patients aged 50 or older. In contrast, no association was noticed between age and anti-ENA Abs. There was no female preponderance found in the presence of anti-ENA and -dsDNA Abs. In conclusion, our study shows that the ANA titer but not the immunofluorescence pattern is useful in predicting anti-ENA Abs. In contrast, both the ANA titer and the immunofluorescence pattern help in predicting anti-dsDNA Abs. Samples with low titer ANAs (1:160 or less) may not need a further test for anti-ENA Abs unless an ANA-associated disease is highly suspected. However, a test for anti-dsDNA Abs should be considered in samples with a homogeneous pattern at any titer including low titers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15801070     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-004-0937-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  7 in total

1.  The distribution of antinuclear antibody titers in "normal" children and adults.

Authors:  W Y Craig; T B Ledue; A M Johnson; R F Ritchie
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Is high titre ANA specific for connective tissue disease?

Authors:  J H Vaile; L Dyke; R Kherani; C Johnston; T Higgins; A S Russell
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.473

3.  Detection and identification of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in a large and consecutive cohort of serum samples referred for ANA testing.

Authors:  I Peene; L Meheus; E M Veys; F De Keyser
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Guidelines for clinical use of the antinuclear antibody test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens. American College of Pathologists.

Authors:  A Kavanaugh; R Tomar; J Reveille; D H Solomon; H A Homburger
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Detection and identification of antinuclear autoantibodies in the serum of normal blood donors.

Authors:  K de Vlam; F De Keyser; G Verbruggen; M Vandenbossche; B Vanneuville; D D'Haese; E M Veys
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  Cascade testing for autoantibodies in connective tissue diseases.

Authors:  H A Homburger
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Usefulness of antinuclear antibody testing to screen for rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  P N Malleson; M Sailer; M J Mackinnon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.791

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Antinuclear antibodies detection: A comparative study between automated recognition and conventional visual interpretation.

Authors:  ZhiYan Li; RuiLin Han; ZhenLin Yan; LiJuan Li; ZhenRu Feng
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Determination of cut-off titers and agreement between immunofluorescence and immunoblotting methods for detecting antinuclear antibodies in children.

Authors:  G Aksu; N Gulez; E Azarsiz; N Karaca; N Kutukçuler
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Comparative study of immunofluorescent antinuclear antibody test and line immunoassay detecting 15 specific autoantibodies in patients with systemic rheumatic disease.

Authors:  Sun Ah Lee; Jimin Kahng; Yonggoo Kim; Yeon-Joon Park; Kyungja Han; Seung-Ki Kwok; Sung-Hwan Park; Eun-Jee Oh
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Automated evaluation of autoantibodies on human epithelial-2 cells as an approach to standardize cell-based immunofluorescence tests.

Authors:  Karl Egerer; Dirk Roggenbuck; Rico Hiemann; Max-Georg Weyer; Thomas Büttner; Boris Radau; Rosemarie Krause; Barbara Lehmann; Eugen Feist; Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 5.  Current concepts and future directions for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies.

Authors:  Michael Mahler; Pier-Luigi Meroni; Xavier Bossuyt; Marvin J Fritzler
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 6.  Assessment of antinuclear antibodies (ANA): National recommendations on behalf of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Andrea Tešija Kuna; Lovorka Đerek; Vedrana Drvar; Ana Kozmar; Katarina Gugo
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.313

7.  Absence of some common organ-specific and non-organ-specific autoimmunity in autoimmune polyendocrinopathy candidiasis ectodermal dystrophy.

Authors:  Nicolas Kluger; Kai Krohn; Annamari Ranki
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.335

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.