Literature DB >> 11704322

Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 GY at 2.5 GY per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: preliminary results on late toxicity and quality of life.

P A Kupelian1, C A Reddy, E A Klein, T R Willoughby.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present our preliminary observations on the late toxicity and quality of life (QOL) of patients treated with short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-one patients were treated with SCIM-RT at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between October 1998 and May 1999. The technique consisted of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using 5 static fields (anterior, 2 laterals, and 2 anterior obliques). Inverse plans were generated by the Corvus treatment-planning system. The treatment delivery was performed with a dynamic multileaf collimator. A total of 70.0 Gy was prescribed in all cases at 2.5 Gy per fraction to be delivered in 28 fractions over 5 and a half weeks. The location of the prostate gland was verified and adjusted daily with the BAT transabdominal ultrasound system. The median follow-up was 18 months (range: 11 to 26 months). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scales were used to evaluate late toxicity. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was used to evaluate QOL. A total of 24 patients completed the EPIC questionnaire at approximately 2 years after therapy (median time from treatment to questionnaire administration: 24 months; range: 21 to 26 months). The results from the EPIC questionnaires were compared to scores from 46 patients treated during the same time period with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) to 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction.
RESULTS: The dose was prescribed to an isodose line ranging from 82.0% to 90.0% (mean: 87.2%). The range of the individual prostate mean doses was 73.5 to 78.5 Gy (average: 75.3 Gy). To date, only 1 patient had Grade 1 late urinary toxicity. To date, only 4 patients had Grade 1 late rectal toxicity. No Grade 2 or 3 late urinary or rectal complications have occurred. The actuarial rectal bleeding rate observed at 18 months was 7%. There were no differences in scores from the urinary, bowel, hormonal, and overall QOL domains between SCIM-RT patients and patients treated with CRT. The overall physical and mental QOL scores were also nearly identical to scores reported for the general U.S. population.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary late toxicity results up to 2 years after SCIM-RT are encouraging, with a median follow-up of 18 months (range 11 to 26 months). Late toxicity assessed by the physicians using RTOG late toxicity scores has been excellent. QOL reported by the patients using the EPIC questionnaire reveals no difference between patients treated with high-dose CRT at standard fractionation and patients treated with SCIM-RT. SCIM-RT is an alternative method of dose escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The proposed schedule significantly increases convenience to patients due to the decrease in overall treatment time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11704322     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01730-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

Review 1.  [Optimizing the use of radiotherapy with IMRT and image guided location of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Lohr; M Fuss; U Tiefenbacher; M Siegsmund; S Mai; J M Kunnappallil; B Dobler; P Alken; F Wenz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alex Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven Feigenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Robert A Price
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  70 Gy or more: which dose for which prostate cancer?

Authors:  U Ganswindt; F Paulsen; A G Anastasiadis; A Stenzl; M Bamberg; C Belka
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  A comparison of acute and chronic toxicity for men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or (125)I permanent implant.

Authors:  Thomas N Eade; Eric M Horwitz; Karen Ruth; Mark K Buyyounouski; David J D'Ambrosio; Steven J Feigenberg; David Y T Chen; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Intrarectal amifostine during external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer produces significant improvements in Quality of Life measured by EPIC score.

Authors:  Nicole L Simone; Cynthia Ménard; Benjamin P Soule; Paul S Albert; Peter Guion; Sharon Smith; Denise Godette; Nancy S Crouse; Linda C Sciuto; Theresa Cooley-Zgela; Kevin Camphausen; C Norman Coleman; Anurag K Singh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Dosimetric comparison of image guidance by megavoltage computed tomography versus bone alignment for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jörn Kalz; Florian Sterzing; Kai Schubert; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  A randomized trial comparing hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated three-dimensional external-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma : a report on acute toxicity.

Authors:  Darius Norkus; Albert Miller; Juozas Kurtinaitis; Uwe Haverkamp; Sergey Popov; Franz-Josef Prott; Konstantinas Povilas Valuckas
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Randomized trial of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Gail Walker; Eric M Horwitz; Robert Price; Steven Feigenberg; Andre A Konski; Radka Stoyanova; Benjamin Movsas; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Charlie Ma; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Dose-dependent uptake of 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18) F]fluorothymidine by the bowel after total-body irradiation.

Authors:  Markus Hartenbach; Andreas Delker; Sabrina Hartenbach; Juli Schlichtiger; Sabrina Niedermoser; Carmen Wängler; Björn Wängler; Guido Böning; Franz Josef Gildehaus; Klement Neumaier; Kirsten Lauber; Klaus Kraft; Claus Belka; Marcus Hacker; Viktor Meineke; Peter Bartenstein
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Endo-rectal balloon cavity dosimetry in a phantom: performance under IMRT and helical tomotherapy beams.

Authors:  Nicholas Hardcastle; Peter E Metcalfe; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.