Literature DB >> 11703498

Who wants to know if their care is rationed? Views of citizens and service informants.

J Coast1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of citizens and service informants about whether they would want to know about any rationing of their own health care.
DESIGN: In-depth interviews using a semistructured schedule. Data were analysed using the methods of constant comparison. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Citizens and service informants. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Issues around health care rationing were explored within the context of the United Kingdom health care system.
RESULTS: The views of citizens and service informants were very similar in terms of whether they, personally, wanted to know about any rationing of their own care, with the vast majority wanting to be given this information. Informants were also similar in terms of their reasons for wanting to know about rationing: to be given a 'good explanation' to enable them to judge whether the decision made had been correct; and to enable them to change the decision if necessary, either through protest or payment. Many informants suggested that they would indeed be likely to react either by challenging the decision or by paying for care.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that policies to be open with people about the rationing of care would be welcomed, but also indicate that if protest follows such openness, it may be difficult for the health service to cope with greater explicitness. Further research is needed among patient groups actually facing this situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11703498      PMCID: PMC5060085          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00147.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  11 in total

1.  Citizens, their agents and health care rationing: an exploratory study using qualitative methods.

Authors:  J Coast
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Rationing: the search for sunlight.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991 Dec 21-28

3.  Retracing the Oregon trail: the experience of rationing and the Oregon health plan.

Authors:  C Ham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-27

4.  The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.

Authors:  B New
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-22

5.  The rationing debate. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit. The case against.

Authors:  J Coast
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-04-12

6.  Bridging the gap between public expectations and public willingness to pay.

Authors:  C H Smee
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Rationing breast reduction surgery.

Authors:  N Horlock; R P Cole; L F Rossi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-04-05

8.  Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationing.

Authors:  D Mechanic
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-24

9.  Rationing health care.

Authors:  R Klein
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-07-21

10.  Information needs in terminal illness.

Authors:  J S Kutner; J F Steiner; K K Corbett; D W Jahnigen; P L Barton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness.

Authors:  Mikael Svensson; Fredrik O L Nilsson; Karl Arnberg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the debates surrounding decision rules.

Authors:  Samuel D Shillcutt; Damian G Walker; Catherine A Goodman; Anne J Mills
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  To accept, or not to accept, that is the question: citizen reactions to rationing.

Authors:  Mari Broqvist; Peter Garpenby
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Exploring public attitudes towards approaches to discussing costs in the clinical encounter.

Authors:  Marion Danis; Roseanna Sommers; Jean Logan; Beverly Weidmer; Shirley Chen; Susan Goold; Steven Pearson; Greer Donley; Elizabeth McGlynn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Thorny questions on the way to disclosing rationing.

Authors:  Marion Danis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Bedside rationing by general practitioners: a postal survey in the Danish public healthcare system.

Authors:  Sigurd M R Lauridsen; Michael Norup; Peter Rossel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The Relative Importance of Clinical, Economic, Patient Values and Feasibility Criteria in Cancer Drug Reimbursement in Canada: A Revealed Preferences Analysis of Recommendations of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review 2011-2017.

Authors:  Chris Skedgel; Dominika Wranik; Min Hu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.981

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.